From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f177.google.com (mail-wj0-f177.google.com [209.85.210.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B865588 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:30:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f177.google.com with SMTP id tk12so101489685wjb.3 for ; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:30:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2HSRQsU+Xv1jm9CJpYYjqeVC8ulxyOEvrZ6tI6BE4r0=; b=wh0obuPLKwVD9g0XTq2AyqSllNIk15KC/rURZivPS9k0KFT/5HiOXEPug8Qr7uhW3e vqLIofBnfQpJN+zkSTztyGnlDR/utP6dQ7jmIELZt7xouVBYhRB+/+NUClchb+6d11ht hkBeVUyTE+W6zipANpG/QfJj1NO9bR3eC4m5aSiuhsk1qciPGrA0GeHAKiFqsxnnF2w8 FTfDRfRTyKTWsWoUI4FuJIL3OXRWVHGgioMPQpVVnx6+6qxYaepHuiItgSainP2/1uEZ Da6JZ/3nibeel/fXU5ZMjCHYDJIZBVklwhFQ+XPuSM/1PvdnaF2k6QsMFOBz8plF5hDF yg7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2HSRQsU+Xv1jm9CJpYYjqeVC8ulxyOEvrZ6tI6BE4r0=; b=K1QvQ++CgbuMVYLQTk9fYmzzmVTuj8edKu+PMvyEx172KhJllNGfRcpoO0PqtiTnSn RI2HTF+ZtxyeZT/jWP0Cbmyh5VYJZcgJvpkD8Zr5VswIiEzWURzZa+F9ZcfaWyeJc8XP jxGKFHG7tt5rEjaxVG83BrEPlfebiXfW4eygHVRnUpfi8RmjC7aRLl2Cg6MHvKNI0BRm M3pZZdzVo2exkngscTpqiC2L/BBNDRaQtKjU7CYp9MIQQb3Gz52sMRetfIl8kzyqxwAg IOCW0KwiBfSJsZ8Tc50jGFvE89oBcZReccjrMUvnhr84ojxNqFS//EtvgtTubADrJAtb hRkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02DElTQwi7DH9MHopQ5tztqbVlbBmQPPqhULPor55d5gWFUOILi1QDf7jjWi1+cwDOr X-Received: by 10.194.120.226 with SMTP id lf2mr4325398wjb.130.1481920253689; Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:30:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:18c8:ab1b:b2a2:b9be? ([2a01:e35:8a8e:1b70:18c8:ab1b:b2a2:b9be]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm4872665wmi.21.2016.12.16.12.30.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 16 Dec 2016 12:30:52 -0800 (PST) To: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org References: <20161216143919.4909-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20161216190257.6921-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20161216190257.6921-19-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Cc: Jingjing Wu , Helin Zhang , Wenzhuo Lu , Chen Jing D , Bernard Iremonger From: Vincent JARDIN Organization: www.6wind.com Message-ID: <716260c7-4120-9984-3c46-02ad50b11a94@6wind.com> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 21:30:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161216190257.6921-19-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 18/29] app/testpmd: use VFD APIs on i40e X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 20:30:54 -0000 Le 16/12/2016 à 20:02, Ferruh Yigit a écrit : > +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD > "set all queues drop (port_id) (on|off)\n" > " Set drop enable bit for all queues.\n\n" > > "set vf split drop (port_id) (vf_id) (on|off)\n" > " Set split drop enable bit for a VF from the PF.\n\n" > +#endif it is not related to i40e. This serie should only be for i40e. Moreover, it is a strange logic: how will it scale for all PMDs?