DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] Cleanup of secondary proc fbarray files?
@ 2018-07-31 16:36 Eads, Gage
  2018-08-01  8:01 ` Burakov, Anatoly
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eads, Gage @ 2018-07-31 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev; +Cc: Burakov, Anatoly

As far as I can tell, DPDK does not destroy secondary process fbarray files - i.e. those whose names end with "_<PID>". With enough secondary processes and memory usage per application, and after enough repeat executions, these can take up a significant amount of space. Is the user expected to clean these up themselves, or is this a bug in DPDK?

Perhaps this is a good candidate for including in rte_eal_cleanup()?

Thanks,
Gage

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-01  8:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-07-31 16:36 [dpdk-dev] Cleanup of secondary proc fbarray files? Eads, Gage
2018-08-01  8:01 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-08-01  8:08   ` Burakov, Anatoly

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).