DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] pci/linux: copy new id for inserted device
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 10:40:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7220007.vanevMHQ6d@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201012220136.6618-1-james.r.harris@intel.com>

13/10/2020 00:01, Jim Harris:
> When a device is inserted into an existing BDF slot
> that has not been probed, we must overwrite the old
> PCI ID with the ID of the new function. Otherwise
> we may not probe the function with the correct driver,
> if at all.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jim Harris <james.r.harris@intel.com>
> ---
> --- a/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/linux/pci.c
> @@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ pci_scan_one(const char *dirname, const struct rte_pci_addr *addr)
>  				if (!rte_dev_is_probed(&dev2->device)) {
>  					dev2->kdrv = dev->kdrv;
>  					dev2->max_vfs = dev->max_vfs;
> +					dev2->id = dev->id;

This simple assignment looks nicer than memcpy.
Thanks for this change.

[...]
>  					if (dev2->kdrv != dev->kdrv ||
> -						dev2->max_vfs != dev->max_vfs)
> +						dev2->max_vfs != dev->max_vfs ||
> +						dev2->id != dev->id)

Unfortunately comparison of structs is not supported.
It seems your original memcmp is right.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-13  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-21 22:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Jim Harris
2020-08-24 21:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jim Harris
2020-10-07 15:05   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12 20:58     ` Harris, James R
2020-10-12 21:54       ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12 22:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Jim Harris
2020-10-13  8:40     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-10-13 14:06     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Jim Harris
2020-10-13 17:03     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Jim Harris
2020-10-13 21:02       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7220007.vanevMHQ6d@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=james.r.harris@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).