From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1861B508 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:07:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4AA21A1E; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:07:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:07:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=MTLRsrrriOUFhu65+xc9jNP1+a+7yGA4w7Gkh8lHj94=; b=KZuDn2VmVtn1 zrfTZv3WuQ3K98AWTEPV1i0XM8VnNU4eA76K+5zUvTBDaey/JgJz0EBy8kAqYSdG jWyhyzFSgvAQtHosJPVG2bjxK4ZKLbTAXSitmdMX83Gmb5J7ISN130TJRc4TUpA1 ZS2iXFyg9w/U2RkxEABUwHxT5yGLka4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=MTLRsrrriOUFhu65+xc9jNP1+a+7yGA4w7Gkh8lHj 94=; b=odYvaXl62loE+w21H4XItb5CU4eIZ0NSOYWJnUM5HThrQlBcbhcI0TUd8 njFhBQbP/azANIvnPN9x7TXHyML9R/pgslTqYTcB1h7V7UfYHLgclx4uuOQw1zjf eCKHrtbxLND6rCyVyiYNBcxeRtIE/naA3PiIJUNarwhocv0HQ+LtWpMPbQZQA/rf TuBn4C5tK3K/TDbzWa0Tq1O1cKxzNlrNuujHR1wa/RUjGuRINSRWorqPeJgGYdlc wVnkaFgPV/FWkkGSsG3XEP2TUt4lUbG0o5ViCjFi/ZwWW4GvKjQFwoTgS0kOB9bb SWcmllIZMzREP7OKvfhChqvsRp0Rg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4E115102ED; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:07:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Wiles, Keith" , Raslan Darawsheh Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Shahaf Shuler , Ori Kam , "Yigit, Ferruh" Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 16:07:47 +0200 Message-ID: <7239433.uTLSZrmg9m@xps> In-Reply-To: <1A466485-DCE8-40ED-9DDB-E66A0DB2B4A0@intel.com> References: <1539154988-20652-1-git-send-email-rasland@mellanox.com> <1A466485-DCE8-40ED-9DDB-E66A0DB2B4A0@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] net/tap: add queue and port ids in Rx/Tx queues structures X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 14:07:51 -0000 10/10/2018 14:50, Wiles, Keith: > > > On Oct 10, 2018, at 2:03 AM, Raslan Darawsheh wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Raslan Darawsheh > > This title for the patch is the what we did not why we did it, should that be changed? To me it does not convey the reason or we would need to add a more complete comment body text to explain why we wanted the change. It is a bit of nit picking. I think the question "why" must be answered in the body.