From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1lrp0011.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.11]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570A036D for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 09:13:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.142) by AMSPR06MB087.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1005.10; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:16:49 +0000 Received: from AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.148]) by AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.7.148]) with mapi id 15.00.1005.008; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:16:49 +0000 From: Ilan Borenshtein To: "Wu, Jingjing" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: Signature filter for virtual function Thread-Index: Ac+3u2ouJ7b6cNiXT4+k2JCaYR6AgwAoZ+aQAGO51bAAJAhAoAAN24Fw Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:16:49 +0000 Message-ID: <7241f60d228f4a4dae39ed26f316d81c@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> References: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD8DA4@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <735e767ffc77477ab517319407651172@AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD91C6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8AD91C6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [62.219.196.223] x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:; x-forefront-prvs: 03077579FF x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(189002)(377454003)(164054003)(199003)(13464003)(51704005)(81542001)(107046002)(107886001)(74662001)(92566001)(87936001)(2656002)(106356001)(86362001)(77096002)(81342001)(21056001)(85852003)(74502001)(31966008)(83072002)(33646002)(66066001)(85306004)(95666004)(76576001)(46102001)(108616004)(20776003)(80022001)(19580395003)(19580405001)(83322001)(105586002)(77982001)(4396001)(101416001)(79102001)(74316001)(50986999)(54356999)(93886004)(99396002)(76176999)(76482001)(2501001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:AMSPR06MB087; H:AMSPR06MB086.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: asocstech.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 07:13:29 -0000 Looking for director packet to different queues in a VF. Will it be implemented in future releases ? -----Original Message----- From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com]=20 Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 3:40 AM To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function Could you explain what exactly you want? Director packet to a VF? Or direct= or packet to different queue in a VF? For the first one, I think if you know which queue the VF is using, the flo= w director can do it (it's my understanding, haven't try). But for the latter, I have no idea which way can be used instead.=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ilan Borenshtein [mailto:ilan@asocstech.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2014 3:34 PM > To: Wu, Jingjing; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Is there any other way except of the Flow director to use the different R= x queues by a VF ? > Will the next versions support flow director for VF ? >=20 > Thanks, > Ilan B >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Wu, Jingjing [mailto:jingjing.wu@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 10:51 AM > To: Ilan Borenshtein; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: Signature filter for virtual function >=20 > Hi >=20 > Flow director is not supported on VF now. > I think this may be the reason why ENOTSUP is returned. >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ilan=20 > > Borenshtein > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 8:34 PM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Signature filter for virtual function > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to configure the flow director of VF 82599 port using=20 > > rte_eth_dev_fdir_add_signature_filter (). > > The function returns with ENOTSUP. > > Doe's flow director supported for VF ? > > What can be the reason for ENOTSUP ? > > > > Thanks, > > Ilan B