DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
	andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com,
	jerinj@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Questions about reporting auto-negotiation capability
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2021 09:19:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7245184.973KLNHvPo@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9105928.7imIDBDKWL@thomas>

29/03/2021 09:03, Thomas Monjalon:
> 29/03/2021 06:02, Huisong Li:
> >          'speed_capa' in struct rte_eth_dev_info is defined as follows:
> > 
> > uint32_t speed_capa;  /**< Supported speeds bitmap (ETH_LINK_SPEED_). */
> > 
> > 
> >        Most PMD drivers use this field to report the speeds capability 
> > supported by the device to the upper-layer app.
> > 
> > But it seems that few NICs report their auto-negotiation capability 
> > through this field. If NIC also uses it to report
> > their auto-negotiation capability through this field, and should set it 
> > to ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG(0) based on
> > the definition of ETH_LINK_SPEED_xxx. In this case, it conflicts the 
> > report of the speeds capability .
> > 
> > I don't know how to correctly report the auto-negotiation capability of 
> > the device. Thanks for your reply.
> 
> ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG is not for capabilities.
> Anyway, if it is set, it changes nothing (0) in the bitmap.
> I see mlx5 is wrongly using it.
> 
> speed_capa is only for enumerating speeds.

I see some drivers are advertising ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED in speed_capa
if the device cannot support autonegotiation.
Should we add a note in doxygen?



  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-29  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-29  4:02 Huisong Li
2021-03-29  7:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-29  7:19   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-03-29 11:44     ` Huisong Li
2021-03-29 12:05       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-29 14:18     ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-03-29  7:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] drivers/net: remove useless autoneg capability Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-29 14:12   ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-04-01 13:26     ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7245184.973KLNHvPo@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).