From: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
To: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal/linuxapp: fix resource leak
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 08:55:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72463300-a846-43a7-11d4-65a48b6370d0@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462982465-129762-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
Hi,
On 11/05/2016 17:01, Daniel Mrzyglod wrote:
> Fix issue reported by Coverity.
> Coverity ID 97920
>
> munmap structure of hugepage
>
> leaked_storage: Variable hugepage going out of scope leaks the storage
> it points to.
>
> The system resource will not be reclaimed and reused, reducing the future
> availability of the resource.
I'm not really fond of this commit messages, but if no one minds them,
so be it.
> In rte_eal_hugepage_init: Leak of memory or pointers to system resources
>
> Fixes: b6a468ad41d5 ("memory: add --socket-mem option")
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mrzyglod <danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> index 5b9132c..cd40cc9 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_memory.c
> @@ -1051,7 +1051,7 @@ int
> rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
> {
> struct rte_mem_config *mcfg;
> - struct hugepage_file *hugepage, *tmp_hp = NULL;
> + struct hugepage_file *hugepage = NULL, *tmp_hp = NULL;
> struct hugepage_info used_hp[MAX_HUGEPAGE_SIZES];
>
> uint64_t memory[RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES];
> @@ -1374,6 +1374,8 @@ rte_eal_hugepage_init(void)
>
> fail:
> free(tmp_hp);
> + if (hugepage != NULL)
> + munmap(hugepage, nr_hugefiles * sizeof(struct hugepage_file));
> return -1;
> }
>
You missed the last conditional if(...0 of the function where it returns
directly with error value.
Looking at the code a bit, we never check for anything other than < 0
return value, so I'd just do a 'goto fail' instead.
Sergio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-12 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-11 16:01 Daniel Mrzyglod
2016-05-12 7:55 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy [this message]
2016-05-13 10:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-05-12 9:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Daniel Mrzyglod
2016-06-20 9:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-06-22 16:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Daniel Mrzyglod
2016-06-30 13:31 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-07-06 10:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Daniel Mrzyglod
2016-07-06 10:48 ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2016-07-10 13:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72463300-a846-43a7-11d4-65a48b6370d0@intel.com \
--to=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
--cc=danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).