DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gray, Mark D" <mark.d.gray@intel.com>
To: Jun Xiao <jun.xiao@cloudnetengine.com>,
	discuss <discuss@openvswitch.org>,  dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [ovs-discuss] vswitches performance comparison
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 18:14:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <738D45BC1F695740A983F43CFE1B7EA92E2BEF4B@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <----Tc------lRRzc$3e501353-5ebe-4161-b9d4-01ebdf81a6de@cloudnetengine.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss [mailto:discuss-bounces@openvswitch.org] On Behalf Of Jun
> Xiao
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 7:01 PM
> To: discuss; dev
> Subject: [ovs-discuss] vswitches performance comparison
> 
> After CloudNetEngine vswitch technical preview is launched, we received
> quite a few queries on vswitches performance comparison, but we cannot
> simply give a  test result on our platform because performance varies on
> different H/Ws and different workloads, and that's why we encourage you to
> try the evaluation package to get real data on your setup.
> 
> Anyway, we share a little more performance data on our H/W which is a
> comparison  among native kernel OVS/OVS-DPDK/CNE vswitch under the
> most common workload:
> concurrent bi-directional TCP traffics cross hosts, and hope you can have a
> rough idea.
> http://www.cloudnetengine.com/weblog/2015/07/22/vswitches-
> performance-comparison/

I think there is an issue with you methodology. ovs-dpdk performance should be
significantly higher than kernel ovs.

> 
> Thanks,
> Jun
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-21 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-21 18:00 [dpdk-dev] " Jun Xiao
2015-07-21 18:14 ` Gray, Mark D [this message]
2015-07-21 18:28   ` [dpdk-dev] [ovs-discuss] " Jun Xiao
2015-07-21 18:36     ` Gray, Mark D
2015-07-21 18:48       ` Jun Xiao
2015-07-22  8:06         ` Gray, Mark D
2015-07-21 21:02 ` [dpdk-dev] " Stephen Hemminger
2015-07-22  8:07   ` Gray, Mark D

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=738D45BC1F695740A983F43CFE1B7EA92E2BEF4B@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=mark.d.gray@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=discuss@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=jun.xiao@cloudnetengine.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).