Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net-i40e-Match-on-outer-and-inner-headers-for-tunnel

["Kar, Subarna" <subarna.kar@intel.com>]

Can I ask what kind of packets you are sending? Because your packets shouldn't hit my code. This is to accept flows for tunneled pkts on outer and inner headers.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tu, Lijuan 
Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 8:52 PM
To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Kar, Subarna <subarna.kar@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Tu, Lijuan <lijuan.tu@intel.com>
Cc: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Gasparakis, Joseph <joseph.gasparakis@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net-i40e-Match-on-outer-and-inner-headers-for-tunnel

Hi Subarna,

This patch cause a big performance drop , ~30% with single core performance test case.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zhang, Qi Z
> Sent: Thursday, December 6, 2018 7:45 PM
> To: Kar, Subarna <subarna.kar@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Gasparakis, Joseph 
> <joseph.gasparakis@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH]
> net-i40e-Match-on-outer-and-inner-headers-for-tunnel
> 
> Hi Subarna:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kar, Subarna
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 5, 2018 7:13 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Wu, Jingjing 
> > <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Kar, Subarna <subarna.kar@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] 
> > net-i40e-Match-on-outer-and-inner-headers-for-tunnel
> 
> The title is not following DPDK style
> it could be
> net/i40e: match on outer and inner headers for tunnel.
> 
> Also please add detail commit log for such a large patch.
> 
> Btw, the patch is too large, it's better to separate it into small 
> ones
> 
> So far what I can suggestion is, at least you can separate into 2 
> patches One for new feature in fdir low level and one for bridge rte_flow to fdir.
> 
> Below are some captures
> >
> > From: Subarna Kar <subarna.kar@intel.com>
> >
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c |  14 +- 
> > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h | 109 +++++-
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_fdir.c   | 392 +++++++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/net/i40e/i40e_flow.c   | 781
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  4 files changed, 1250 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c 
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c index 7030eb1..0e9f22d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
> > @@ -1788,6 +1788,7 @@ i40e_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> >  	 * legacy filter API is deprecated, the following codes should also be
> >  	 * removed.
> >  	 */
> > +	dev->data->dev_conf.fdir_conf.mode = RTE_FDIR_MODE_PERFECT;
> 
> This is not correct, this will prevent vPMD be used for all cases, I 
> know vPMD should not be used when the new flow be enabled, and below 
> patch has some issue will break this, but we should fix on that patch anyway.
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/45697/
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h 
> > b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h index 11ecfc3..f7311ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h
> > @@ -466,6 +466,92 @@ struct i40e_vmdq_info {  #define
> > I40E_FLEX_WORD_MASK(off) (0x80 >> (off))
> >  #define I40E_FDIR_IPv6_TC_OFFSET	20
> >
> >  static inline int
> > +i40e_flow_fdir_fill_outer_header(const struct i40e_fdir_input *fdir_input,
> > +				 unsigned char *raw_pkt)
> > +{
> > +	struct ipv4_hdr *ip;
> > +	struct ipv6_hdr *ip6;
> > +	struct udp_hdr *udp;
> > +	struct rte_flow_item_gre *gre;
> > +	struct rte_flow_item_mpls *mpls;
> > +	struct rte_flow_item_vxlan *vxlan;
> > +	uint16_t *ether_type;
> > +	uint8_t len = 2 * sizeof(struct ether_addr);
> > +	raw_pkt += 2 * sizeof(struct ether_addr);
> > +	ether_type = (uint16_t *)raw_pkt;
> > +	raw_pkt += sizeof(uint16_t);
> > +	len += sizeof(uint16_t);
> > +
> > +
> > +	//we don't need ETH, so direct skip to IP
> 
> It's better to use /* xxx */ to follow coding style And same comment 
> for all other places (except the case that you see nearby comment is 
> already broken and you just follow it :))
> 
> > +		vxlan = (struct rte_flow_item_vxlan *)raw_pkt;
> > +		if (fdir_input->flow_ext.iip_type == I40E_FDIR_IPTYPE_IPV4) {
> > +			vxlan->vni[0] =
> > +				fdir_input->flow.vxlanudp4_flow.vxlan.vni[0];
> > +			vxlan->vni[1] =
> > +				fdir_input->flow.vxlanudp4_flow.vxlan.vni[1];
> > +			vxlan->vni[2] =
> > +				fdir_input->flow.vxlanudp4_flow.vxlan.vni[2];
> > +		} else {
> > +			vxlan->vni[0] =
> > +				fdir_input->flow.vxlan6udp4_flow.vxlan.vni[0];
> > +			vxlan->vni[1] =
> > +				fdir_input->flow.vxlan6udp4_flow.vxlan.vni[1];
> > +			vxlan->vni[2] =
> > +				fdir_input->flow.vxlan6udp4_flow.vxlan.vni[2];
> > +		}
> > +		vxlan->flags = VXLAN_DEFAULT_FLAG;
> > +		len += sizeof(struct rte_flow_item_vxlan);
> > +	} else {
> > +      //now put MPLS info for MPLSoUDP and MPLSoGRE
> 
> The intend is not correct, replace spaces with tab
> 
> > +
> > +static int
> > +i40e_flow_parse_fdir_tunnel_pattern(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> > +				    const struct rte_flow_item *pattern,
> > +				    struct rte_flow_error *error,
> > +				    struct i40e_fdir_filter_conf *filter)
> 
> There is couple intend issue in this function, please double check.
> 
> >
> >  	i = 0;
> > @@ -4621,9 +5382,17 @@ i40e_flow_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> >  			rte_free(items);
> >  			return -rte_errno;
> >  		}
> > -		if (parse_filter)
> > -			ret = parse_filter(dev, attr, items, actions,
> > +		if (parse_filter) {
> > +			if (parse_filter != TUNNEL_FDIR_FUNCTION &&
> > +				 rss == true) {
> 
> s/rss == true/rss
> 
> > +				ret = i40e_parse_rss_filter(dev, attr, pattern,
> > +						actions, &cons_filter, error);
> > +				return ret;
> > +			} else {
> > +				ret = parse_filter(dev, attr, items, actions,
> >  					   error, &cons_filter);
> > +			}
> > +		}
> >  		flag = true;
> >  	} while ((ret < 0) && (i < RTE_DIM(i40e_supported_patterns)));
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4