DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, rasland@nvidia.com, matan@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/mlx5: fix ROCE LAG bond device probing
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:45:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <73954955.ZbVXDTKmUn@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721083140.7719-1-viacheslavo@nvidia.com>

21/07/2021 10:31, Viacheslav Ovsiienko:
> The ROCE LAG bond device requires neither E-Switch nor SR-IOV
> configurations. It means the ROCE LAG bond device might be
> presented as a single port Infiniband device.
> 
> The mlx5 PMD wrongly recognized standalone ROCE LAG bond device
> as E-Switch configuration, this triggered the calls of E-Switch
> ports related API and the latter failed (over the new OFED kernel
> driver, starting since 5.4.1), causing the overall device probe
> failure.
> 
> If there is a single port Infiniband bond device found the
> E-Switch related flags must be cleared indicating standalone
> configuration.
> 
> Also, it is not true anymore the bond device can exist
> over E-Switch configurations only (as it was claimed for VF LAG
> bond devices). The related checks are not relevant anymore
> and removed.
> 
> Fixes: 790164ce1d2d ("net/mlx5: check kernel support for VF LAG bonding")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
> Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>

Applied, thanks




      reply	other threads:[~2021-07-22 14:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-21  8:31 [dpdk-dev] " Viacheslav Ovsiienko
2021-07-22 14:45 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=73954955.ZbVXDTKmUn@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).