From: Vivek Sharma <vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RTE-FLOW: PF vs PHY_PORT
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 18:41:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <73def1a6-7097-0381-bde6-aa3801de1f6b@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae99760b-6920-9d3d-927d-d72747457b75@caviumnetworks.com>
Ping.
On Wednesday 22 August 2018 05:16 PM, Vivek Sharma wrote:
> External Email
>
> Hi Devs,
>
> I am trying to enable RTE-FLOW support on one of our platforms & having hard time in figuring out PF vs PHY_PORT differences and DPDK rationale for introducing these two distinct identities.
>
> Rte-Flow distinguishes between RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PF & RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_PHY_PORT and
>
> RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PF & RTE_FLOW_ACTION_TYPE_PHY_PORT.
>
>
> I am finding it difficult to justify the presence of both these types, when functionality & implementation wise, these look quite similar. I would really appreciate if you could illustrate the differences between above item & action types by taking some hardware/platform as reference.
>
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Vivek Sharma
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-27 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-22 11:46 Vivek Sharma
2018-08-27 13:11 ` Vivek Sharma [this message]
2018-08-27 13:45 ` Adrien Mazarguil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=73def1a6-7097-0381-bde6-aa3801de1f6b@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=vivek.sharma@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).