From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC48A04C7; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:50:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAC41C1A2; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:50:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68F01C193; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:50:07 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: A+mQvPasM2VVCtBdPMVTINUO0FO1sFXVH3dDFYkM/x37hDN0S9ExtNzczRqA78WpTp+cMxpIga mBMXu5FQ4Xow== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9745"; a="223591096" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,431,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="223591096" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Sep 2020 22:50:06 -0700 IronPort-SDR: DRUI2rIsHte3gK4k3IUJETpVSh23Y4gOIxcfDXmRr+RhGM2QbjLNeYu14le5HZG/NV8zADQepO IntsZNt15gsw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,431,1592895600"; d="scan'208";a="302442663" Received: from fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.82]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2020 22:50:06 -0700 Received: from shsmsx605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) by fmsmsx602.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Tue, 15 Sep 2020 22:50:05 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX605.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:50:03 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.1713.004; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:50:03 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Guo, Jia" , "Jiang, JunyuX" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "Xing, Beilei" , "stable@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters Thread-Index: AQHWi+lZIkLZ9HE4UkS8SimGf6FvbalqwoCQ Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 05:50:03 +0000 Message-ID: <73e896fbdbea497597d9fc7ae0d55d13@intel.com> References: <20200910015426.3140-1-junyux.jiang@intel.com> <20200916015105.39815-1-junyux.jiang@intel.com> <6d9cb7baf08e4564ba3db80a6a2f6764@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <6d9cb7baf08e4564ba3db80a6a2f6764@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: dev On Behalf Of Guo, Jia > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 1:22 PM > To: Jiang, JunyuX ; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Xing, Beilei ; stable@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters >=20 > Acked-by: Jeff Guo >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jiang, JunyuX > > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 9:51 AM > > To: dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Guo, Jia ; Xing, Beilei > > ; Jiang, JunyuX ; > > stable@dpdk.org > > Subject: [PATCH v2] net/i40e: fix incorrect byte counters > > > > This patch fixed the issue that rx/tx bytes overflowed on 48 bit > > limitation by enlarging the limitation. > > > > Fixes: 4861cde46116 ("i40e: new poll mode driver") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Junyu Jiang > > --- Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi