From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30617A0A02;
	Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:12:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8C3140F4B;
	Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:12:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153B3140F3D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:12:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AE35C00B8;
 Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:12:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:12:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh=
 oBJDA0xRehw0QAOWRrrrFJn5bas/io2k1nWyckLB9zo=; b=JUtZrsJN8kLAiroW
 p7WO1GcRlJkax/ZmJeOp9V2rfnIU/BJi9b6dAZ73n5wVg5+ykgglc2Dbq0sllA6b
 gKtOVKNLNKJllTh3I0uwRdwyRVJkF+ULu+TFxTqQngRKDmFqK6G1dly3gowJBIZi
 XhFbQav7m4LZWtCYFFaNoXX55gavTC6az5fYIu+A+QStsITIkR9hkZwXaA15yhS9
 GiXODtf+jlszRxDOrKhtvEm4UGpoQ974bqVLWZuPOtyytu94XJjKqe+9b7oUozIM
 ma/do2WcoJaLl+OVInx0Q2rPUO5ZWKoOA7bUXxeoPtssNMAbUJKNQlzNRx9qUEZ3
 L5JF1Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=oBJDA0xRehw0QAOWRrrrFJn5bas/io2k1nWyckLB9
 zo=; b=b7464Q1TD9qruWFjjRcC+emz0ep+lf9ykup7nYyyNvISbUcDLY0OzJPpI
 xsqZ8vekwvHpGw83/XUUpKLXvHpboiFofBjDft5mke6Sg/Aj+uBScfZyu6osYlk/
 mlJ6XNgneBdGqGOykYUxBrJ5Rm3Yyb207vX6QlvIV46Csjx9p4GhgkNzbPt/DIwZ
 okjTQA+87GgQ7XbvZ+Tsht7Dda1OOniDsuENVrJSuo8SUSWikqDwoemlUdiwPDiq
 2k+aPLs45B0UlAQAWZhs6225e3T4c6/EG1v1dH5OH0bIUIJM1xA/6Yfjw3S5uYDX
 qH3Xbq6sQWiWM/OccYpKZFFyR0Ggg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:YMRcYKBQ3XaIq-mmtOaG9NZqefi9dWUW-Y76HMoiv9EhfIF6Mclu3Q>
 <xme:YMRcYEgwIc7bAv4X144ujygLfgjaUyeUc_YqhtXBKXg30ZFly21YQx1yYly2hipFE
 apk2kmDKfGA9STcww>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudehtddgleelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
 fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
 uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
 cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr
 shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg
 ftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfeugeevleetueejudefveejtddutdevhfdvteeghedvleefvefg
 hfdtgfefjeeinecuffhomhgrihhnpehtrhgrvhhishdqtghirdgtohhmmhhunhhithihpd
 htrhgrvhhishdqtghirdgtohhmnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucev
 lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrsh
 esmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:YMRcYNmWQn9AtcP7tRyzzed3mlh7e7npDe0Xprm1kKoWdgMMgmk7Rg>
 <xmx:YMRcYIyc0IVKiKkEkxt-abqjpLfcJq75fEwlduTjMCoXrXGXYiNCcw>
 <xmx:YMRcYPQzzFvggAZiOUqwgooJDF604KxNNNoWHPw-Zk7TvUvCsYPk9g>
 <xmx:YMRcYKdLpnQW7okExnOIdssVzy082QYqr_JU9wJdpa-OHIShmPIw5A>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 93C6B24005A;
 Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:11:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
 ruifeng.wang@arm.com, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 18:11:58 +0100
Message-ID: <7406412.c1iilDCem9@thomas>
In-Reply-To: <f7tlfab191z.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>
References: <20200416110053.2547791-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
 <6504633.9roynsBark@thomas> <f7tlfab191z.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: remove aarch64 from Travis jobs
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

25/03/2021 17:40, Aaron Conole:
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> writes:
> >> Travis is not reliable for native Arm and PPC:
> >> https://travis-ci.community/t/disk-quota-exceeded-on-arm64/7619/6
> >> 
> >> In order to get reliable Travis reports,
> >> the use of Arm machines is removed until Travis fixes it.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> >
> > We managed without applying this patch.
> >
> > After one year passed, what is the situation today regarding Travis?
> > Can we rely on Travis service?
> 
> So far, yes.
> 
> > For which workload? Which architecture?
> 
> I think for all of them.  Looking at even the failures which pop up for
> the latest patches, they seem like real failures.
> 
> ex:
>   https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493722400
>   https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493688879
>   https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493624012
>   https://travis-ci.com/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/jobs/493611597
> 
> These are ABI, and doc failures - different arches, etc.
> 
> Seems like it's quite usable.
> 
> > Aaron, what do you recommend?
> 
> I think we should drop this patch - Travis continues to be useful even
> for individual developers checking their own results.  It seems the
> service works quite a bit better now for the project as well, thanks to
> Honnappa and other ARM folks for working with them.

Thanks all, patch classified as "Rejected".