DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: huangdengdui <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
	<liuyonglong@huawei.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: handle IEEE1588 init fail
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:06:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74224bdc-e865-4d5a-94fc-fdd6adb74558@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a15bfb77-7ca3-4026-936a-fabcc6f030d1@amd.com>



On 2024/4/8 16:45, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/8/2024 6:52 AM, huangdengdui wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2024/4/6 0:44, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:44:09 +0800
>>> Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When the port's timestamping function failed to initialize
>>>> (for example, the device does not support PTP), the packets
>>>> received by the hardware do not contain the timestamp.
>>>> In this case, IEEE1588 packet forwarding should not start.
>>>> This patch fix it.
>>>>
>>>> Plus, adding a failure message when failed to disable PTP.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: a78040c990cb ("app/testpmd: update forward engine beginning")
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dengdui Huang <huangdengdui@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> Noticed that ieee1588 part is printing errors to stdout,
>>> but other parts of test-pmd are using stderr or TEST_PMD_LOG.
>>>
>>> It would be good to decide on one good way to handle this
>>> across all of testpmd.
>>
>> Yeah, it's a bit of a mess. Is it better to use TEST_PMD_LOG?
>> But this is a test app, and modifying it seems unnecessary.
>> What should we do next?
>>
> 
> 'TESTPMD_LOG' exists and used in a few places, but still most of the
> logging done with 'printf/fprintf'.
> 
> Agree to have an agreement what to use, document it, and stick to it.
> 
> 
> For some cases, like 'usage()' output (testpmd supported parameters), or
> cmdline prompt we always want to have output, so 'printf' suits well.
> 
> Not sure where 'TESTPMD_LOG' is needed and what is the benefit. I don't
> remember many cases that I want to refine testpmd app level output.
> Maybe a case can be packet verbose output, but it also has its specific
> command to control it.
> 
> So should we continue to 'printf/fprintf', is there any disadvantage to
> do so?
OK, 'printf/fprintf' is really necessary. Am I to understand it as follows?

'TESTPMD_LOG' is more suitable for printing app runtime context logs,
such as initialization logs and uninstallation logs.

'printf' is suitable for normal interaction with the user, such as
show port info <port_id>

When should we print to stderr?

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-09  2:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-30  7:44 Dengdui Huang
2024-04-05 15:36 ` Singh, Aman Deep
2024-07-05 11:27   ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-04-05 16:44 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-04-08  5:52   ` huangdengdui
2024-04-08  8:45     ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-04-09  2:06       ` huangdengdui [this message]
2024-04-09  2:50         ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-04-17  9:26           ` huangdengdui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74224bdc-e865-4d5a-94fc-fdd6adb74558@huawei.com \
    --to=huangdengdui@huawei.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).