DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Polehn, Mike A" <mike.a.polehn@intel.com>
To: ??? <pnk003@naver.com>, "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>,
	"Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How can I calculate/estimate pps(packet per seocond) and bps(bit per second) in DPDK pktg
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 14:21:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <745DB4B8861F8E4B9849C970520ABBF149750F5C@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6668b8405a3e2340ad573f7a236de1d5@cweb05.nm.nhnsystem.com>

The change in tsc value from rte_rdtsc() needs to be multiplied by the scale to convert from clocks to get change in seconds.
For example from below:

elapse_us = (rte_rdtsc() - entry->tsc_first_packet) * flow_time_scale_us;

The bit rate requires the number of bytes passed in the time period then adjusted by the overhead of the number of packets transferred in the time period.

#define FLOWD_PERF_PACKET_OVERHEAD 24 /* CRC + Preamble + SOF + Interpacket gap */

Bits = (Bytes + (Packets*FLOWD_PERF_PACKET_OVERHEAD)) * 8;
Data_Rate = (((double)Bits) / Time_us) * 1e6;

Integer math is very tricky and often is not any faster than floating point math when using multiplies except on the very low performance processors.

Mike

From: 최익성 [mailto:pnk003@naver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 5:45 PM
To: Polehn, Mike A; Wiles, Keith; Van Haaren, Harry; dev@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] How can I calculate/estimate pps(packet per seocond) and bps(bit per second) in DPDK pktg


Dear  Wiles, Keith ,  Van Haaren, Harry,  Polehn, Mike A,  Stephen Hemminger, Kyle Larose, and DPDK experts.



I really appreciate for your precious answers and advices.



I will find and study the corresponding codes and CRC checking.





Last night, I tried to estimate bps and pps by using the following code.





// rte_distributor_process() gets 64 mbufs packets at a time.

// rte_distributor_process() gets packets from Intel® 82599ES 10 Gigabit Ethernet 2 port Controller (2 10gbE ports).



int  rte_distributor_process(struct rte_distributor *d, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned num_mbufs)

{

        uint64_t ticks_per_ms = rte_get_tsc_hz()/1000 ;

        uint64_t ticks_per_s = rte_get_tsc_hz() ;

        uint64_t ticks_per_s_div_8 = rte_get_tsc_hz()/8 ;

        uint64_t cur_tsc = 0, last_tsc = 0, sum_len, bps, pps ;



        cur_tsc = rte_rdtsc();



        sum_len = 0 ;

        for (l=0; l < num_mbufs; l++ ) { sum_len += mbufs[l]->pkt_len ; }



        if ((cur_tsc - last_tsc)!=0) {

               bps = (sum_len * ticks_per_s_div_8 ) / (cur_tsc - last_tsc) ;

               pps = num_mbufs * ticks_per_s / (cur_tsc - last_tsc) ;

        } else bps = pps = 0 ;



        last_tsc = cur_tsc ;

}



I got  max. bit per second = 6,835,440,833 for 20 Gbps 1500 bytes packet traffic, and got max. bit per second = 6,808,524,220 for 2 Gbps 1500 bytes packet traffic.



I guess there can be packet burst, however the estimated value has too many errors.



I will try the methods you proposed.



Thank you very much.



Sincerely Yours,



Ick-Sung Choi.


-----Original Message-----
From: "Polehn, Mike A"<mike.a.polehn@intel.com<mailto:mike.a.polehn@intel.com>>
To: "Wiles, Keith"<keith.wiles@intel.com<mailto:keith.wiles@intel.com>>; "Van Haaren, Harry"<harry.van.haaren@intel.com<mailto:harry.van.haaren@intel.com>>; "???"<pnk003@naver.com<mailto:pnk003@naver.com>>; "dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>"<dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>>;
Cc:
Sent: 2015-11-04 (수) 00:59:34
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] How can I calculate/estimate pps(packet per seocond) and bps(bit per second) in DPDK pktg

I used the following code snip-it with the i40e device, with 1 second sample time had very high accuracy for IPv4 UDP packets:

#define FLOWD_PERF_PACKET_OVERHEAD 24 /* CRC + Preamble + SOF + Interpacket gap */
#define FLOWD_REF_NETWORK_SPEED 10e9

double Ave_Bytes_per_Packet, Data_Rate, Net_Rate;
uint64_t Bits;
uint64_t Bytes = pFlow->flow.n_bytes - pMatch_Prev->flow.n_bytes;
uint64_t Packets = pFlow->flow.n_packets - pMatch_Prev->flow.n_packets;
uint64_t Time_us = pFlow->flow.flow_time_us - pMatch_Prev->flow.flow_time_us;

if (Bytes == 0)
Ave_Bytes_per_Packet = 0.0;
else
Ave_Bytes_per_Packet = ((double)Bytes / (double)Packets) + 4.0;

Bits = (Bytes + (Packets*FLOWD_PERF_PACKET_OVERHEAD)) * 8;
if (Bits == 0)
Data_Rate = 0.0;
else
Data_Rate = (((double)Bits) / Time_us) * 1e6;

if (Data_Rate == 0.0)
Net_Rate = 0.0;
else
Net_Rate = Data_Rate / FLOWD_REF_NETWORK_SPEED;

For packet rate: double pk_rate = (((double)Packets)/ ((double)Time_us)) * 1e6;

To calculate elapsed time in DPDK app, used CPU counter (will not work if counter is being modified):

Initialization:
double flow_time_scale_us;
...
flow_time_scale_us = 1e6/rte_get_tsc_hz();

Elapsed time (uSec) example:

elapse_us = (rte_rdtsc() - entry->tsc_first_packet) *
flow_time_scale_us; /* calc total elapsed us */

-----Original Message-----
From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wiles, Keith
Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:33 AM
To: Van Haaren, Harry; ???; dev@dpdk.org<mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How can I calculate/estimate pps(packet per seocond) and bps(bit per second) in DPDK pktg

On 11/3/15, 8:30 AM, "Van Haaren, Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com<mailto:harry.van.haaren@intel.com>> wrote:

>Hi Keith,
>
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wiles, Keith
><snip>
>> Hmm, I just noticed I did not include the FCS bytes. Does the NIC
>> include FCS bytes in the counters? Need to verify that one and if not then it becomes a bit more complex.
>
>The Intel NICs count packet sizes inclusive of CRC / FCS, from eg the ixgbe/82599 datasheet:
>"This register includes bytes received in a packet from the <Destination Address> field through the <CRC> field, inclusively."

Thanks I assumed I had known that at the time :-)
>
>-Harry
>


Regards,
Keith



[http://mail.naver.com/readReceipt/notify/?img=b9KqKAIOWNISaAMrFomsaAtmF6uqpxUqFAICpAEXKrMXMxUqF430K6t9tzFXp6UmFLl5WLl51zlqDBFdp6d5MreRhoRR16R074u5bzenp6C5tz05%2Bzkn74FTWt%3D%3D.gif]



  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-04 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-03  6:25 최익성
2015-11-03 14:11 ` Wiles, Keith
2015-11-03 14:30   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2015-11-03 14:33     ` Wiles, Keith
2015-11-03 15:59       ` Polehn, Mike A
2015-11-03 19:00         ` Wiles, Keith
2015-11-03 21:55           ` Polehn, Mike A
2015-11-04  1:45         ` 최익성
2015-11-04 14:21           ` Polehn, Mike A [this message]
2015-11-04 23:58             ` 최익성
2015-11-03 22:05     ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-03 22:18       ` Kyle Larose
2015-11-03 23:28         ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-04 13:13           ` Kyle Larose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=745DB4B8861F8E4B9849C970520ABBF149750F5C@ORSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=mike.a.polehn@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=pnk003@naver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).