From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f171.google.com (mail-wj0-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273E810D38 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:14:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c11so22749884wjx.3 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:14:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AxeVlY1jVAR3Jy0IaC/aeC02EXdSQMskArX2cV/4fsk=; b=m1hlOF3hllm273EXFzLft7GAW5/ylGnj+woO6+8tJOVP26xXQ9XYNwqNSNNQfTxx1i ZG2je8xAWmCfRulDlSdNZGaoLTo2wg+8uisi7LR+6UT2fkApXrgfHwgFJ9PtrrZD+JCO jSFcdlJxEG1cAjEDijADlydNe8CvzojfNQJ9DioyJWqyK+WOeTOfyg32CrnPXxh/1P59 a8sxyolfsNhuxdzAwuTmc+5h8s+uyOP2KuTX33owg7EpqKYbBalOXrwsdCT/kMSkQI7D etcGE6FecZNkEc87AVDNxD1lrQEPkIXwzyw95bG7/s3fln6LgHv8Nz7pxW3h1WGULpvj yCRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AxeVlY1jVAR3Jy0IaC/aeC02EXdSQMskArX2cV/4fsk=; b=VeYnOTy2BQdjtyLmTIR85vSmDFBUDuGopwXwk5JqBjAYoBeCGcbIPGGQTm4ffTyd/u uM9TXBrUEgqFlNfE9hqDbdUP6iiE9ieQkbsKFQ1AWwvOzOIbM8k3OMRTMqVfQ2AjLTeM Sio0FbMiqnO+1WFHdoCF2BubepfF8AgSKVRvjo72QU9mNGKRWztOM3IVarwntQyLT6xA DDAfyvgnk1uo65+/dBTckMqFpOIugkoXGL3BU8pPNVXA9E+T7IT696g89vtXc2kRCHx+ l004uU91M6UjkU46olVql5xECi671DtM0A9vnw5IK9IzFNGHiGPNZSRPBP6e1IHq/JSk Mbbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKGHLzWBm7+URaq4ueJAyJ405mty3Fdag03r4hRg6q6JEfpT3f2LZ92/VDDHjBe7Rrh X-Received: by 10.194.99.38 with SMTP id en6mr9251553wjb.184.1482412487867; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:14:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w197sm32145158wmd.11.2016.12.22.05.14.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:14:46 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" Cc: "Kulasek, TomaszX" , dev@dpdk.org, "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "Richardson, Bruce" Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:14:45 +0100 Message-ID: <7594197.BWrLiCir60@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0E2A74@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1477486575-25148-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> <3042915272161B4EB253DA4D77EB373A14F57CDE@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0E2A74@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 1/6] ethdev: add Tx preparation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:14:48 -0000 2016-12-02 00:10, Ananyev, Konstantin: > I have absolutely no problem to remove the RTE_ETHDEV_TX_PREPARE and associated logic. > I personally don't use ARM boxes and don't plan to, > and in theory users can still do conditional compilation at the upper layer, if they want to. Yes you're right. The application can avoid calling tx_prepare at all. No need of an ifdef inside DPDK.