From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5A6A0546; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 11:14:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A99E1411AC; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 11:14:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com (szxga07-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.35]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438CC1411AB for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 11:14:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga07-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FHTlt4SJnz9xNK for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:12:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.103.128] (10.67.103.128) by DGGEMS401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:14:20 +0800 From: "Min Hu (Connor)" To: CC: , , , References: <1616830818-3127-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> Message-ID: <75f5ed48-4a6a-6987-cc1b-cb41eb79d713@huawei.com> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:14:20 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1616830818-3127-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gbk"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.103.128] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] fix check of port and core X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi,Ferruh, bernard, tomasz, bruce and all, Any comments about this set of patches? ÔÚ 2021/3/27 15:40, Min Hu (Connor) дµÀ: > Currently, some examples check that the port is on the same NUMA > node as the polling thread for best performance. The method is > to compare the socket id of port and that of current core. If the > result is different, warning info will be given. > > But it ignores the port which is from numa node 0, that is, no > warning info will be given if the port is from numa node 0, and > this set of patches will fix it. > > Min Hu (Connor) (3): > examples/flow_classify: fix check of port and core > examples/l2fwd-cat: fix check of port and core > examples/skeleton: fix check of port and core > > examples/flow_classify/flow_classify.c | 2 +- > examples/l2fwd-cat/l2fwd-cat.c | 2 +- > examples/skeleton/basicfwd.c | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >