From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1153A0524; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 19:48:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4618C40682; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 19:48:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7FF4067B for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 19:48:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E5B896; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:48:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 05 Feb 2021 13:48:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= QaEEORL9lBgRRS2S0Z5iYdP2qbcmI92Cq58ftkbtioo=; b=juKiU4ZDvEltroFU o2ARQyRQpRhkfKicVv01BH/bfFukpzhoL/tAbQzr+ByrK5yP/KRFUeJawL+GnWu0 92v1chjS5+tHv0JFMTL8ofZQbLf1Z2bIEJjrKN2rFOYY3yBVzUyn/UQrVJY76P1w LjwRnQqsfjBY7kmkqlN7Oznma+SK1ITIoCjj7OEMzGU6BGZTlADgwlM4uFJ+1YHi CGMoFxu1+H3rhIvBq0qB/iHhxEcpbG6lgbocKmpf6hXdTn4nz+qqdUphw0rgYEyB lifiEWpzROF7rnMX+XVI44gwvLuzFgSe3yctBwkdKAY2Du9FkAErToyDeA+b8I22 5TESjA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=QaEEORL9lBgRRS2S0Z5iYdP2qbcmI92Cq58ftkbti oo=; b=GSBIiTWDxVrdIBRsVUcHelc5+EIlAmsIypOyPbCB8iR1XHCmgKl/de5F9 Tcxwmn94r5LnATYOGrZ+pkYsyIFZebw+TT7tt090Ywj30N8XhUJddC2i+ub+G7N7 lhtfLGrxrvfw7Yap9Pdhsl/94KKQq81mKO3QaIGZevelc9/oVim1Sc7iG0YS+HuN KIycFE4khOaKTwPrcfskU4MMLxhuw/Wxbs1EUB6YKrCmp+WhNtUgTtdwAWfb6TgS exFG6YeatDrbZgbMGAlsuU3XWzqA6H98YWAMkOIe88bv1CxCaK+nZUwjA2LUmJjO o0sjLFXZDuiNfWqETPSkbLb4yvv9Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgeeigddutdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9A50F240057; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 13:48:28 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, Bruce Richardson , andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 19:48:27 +0100 Message-ID: <7791248.WS55HqYFGU@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20210204102643.GC1712@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20210129203307.25123-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20210204100520.15414-2-david.marchand@redhat.com> <20210204102643.GC1712@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] builtools: remove build flag for header includes check X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 04/02/2021 11:26, Bruce Richardson: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 11:05:20AM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > > Previous patch just removes the last case of direct inclusion of the > > generic/ headers. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > > --- > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson I think this patch is better understood (in git history I mean) if squashed with the previous one. Removing this flag is the direct consequence of removing the include in mbuf. Squashed and applied, thanks.