From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA05A3DC for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:41:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Aug 2018 06:41:31 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,295,1531810800"; d="scan'208";a="68178893" Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.56]) ([10.237.221.56]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2018 06:41:31 -0700 To: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, Tiwei Bie Cc: Luca Boccassi , dev@dpdk.org, 3chas3@gmail.com References: <1500332723-10812-1-git-send-email-ciwillia@brocade.com> <446b30e7-81f0-4ff8-1e83-108b37f0c6ae@intel.com> <9af52a88-262c-1911-3ce6-9bb01836fc42@brocade.com> <1534341082.5764.25.camel@debian.org> From: Ferruh Yigit Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <78b594b1-bab9-2186-f770-96ab79a71fb2@intel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:41:30 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1534341082.5764.25.camel@debian.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Some small changes to net/virtio X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:41:34 -0000 On 8/15/2018 2:51 PM, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 07:52 -0400, Charles (Chas) Williams wrote: >> >> On 07/18/2017 07:50 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: >>> On 7/18/2017 12:05 AM, Charles (Chas) Williams wrote: >>>> Just a couple small changes to net/virtio that make it a little >>>> more >>>> well behaved. >>> >>> Same question here, is this patchset targets the 17.08-rc2? Can >>> this be >>> postponed? >> >> Yes, these can all be postponed to 17.11.  They are too late for a >> -rc2. > > Hi Ferruh and Maxime, > > Looks like this series fell through the cracks. Any chance you folks > could please have a look at it for 18.11? Thanks! > > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/26994/ > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/26995/ Hi Maxime, Tiwei, Those patches seems missed for a while, they date back to July 2011. Can you guys please look at it? If there is no objection/comment for a little more, they will be automerged as a part of process. Thanks, ferruh