DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: "Walsh, Conor" <conor.walsh@intel.com>,
	"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
	"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc/contributing/documentation: add info about including code
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 12:31:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7938996.8XznLcKUNL@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR11MB3086899BCC84B4FB9D94EDBAFC479@SN6PR11MB3086.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

21/04/2021 12:21, Mcnamara, John:
> From: Walsh, Conor <conor.walsh@intel.com>
> > Currently the documentation describes how to add code snippets to the docs
> > using code blocks. This can be problematic as the code snippets in the
> > docs may fall out of sync with the actual code it is referencing within
> > DPDK. This patch adds instructions to the contribution guide about how to
> > include code in the docs using literalinclude which will dynamically get
> > the code from source when the docs are generated. This will help to ensure
> > that the code within the docs is up to date and not out of sync with the
> > actual code.
> 
> This is a very good suggestion and I think we should encourage doc writers
> to use this when including code in the documentation.

Yes, and we should try to clean-up existing code snippets.



  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-21 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-21  9:11 Conor Walsh
2021-04-21 10:21 ` Mcnamara, John
2021-04-21 10:31   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2021-04-21 14:17     ` Mcnamara, John
2021-04-21 14:21       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-27  9:54         ` David Marchand
2021-04-27  9:54 ` David Marchand
2021-05-03 21:02 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-04  9:32   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-05-04  9:59     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-04 10:35       ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-04 10:44         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-04 11:15           ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-05-04 11:56             ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-05 12:02               ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-05-06 13:50                 ` Walsh, Conor
2021-05-06 16:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] doc/contributing/doc: " Conor Walsh
2021-05-07  9:54   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2021-05-07 13:15     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-05-19 21:36   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7938996.8XznLcKUNL@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=conor.walsh@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).