DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>,
	"Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:57:17 +0200
Message-ID: <7955df3a-d113-bd37-fa6f-77adac8e62c9@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6eeb62672274dc5998ee13550ad1e63@intel.com>

Hi Marvin,

On 10/12/20 11:10 AM, Liu, Yong wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 4:22 PM
>> To: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>;
>> Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path
>>
>> Hi Marvin,
>>
>> On 10/9/20 10:14 AM, Marvin Liu wrote:
>>> Packed ring format is imported since virtio spec 1.1. All descriptors
>>> are compacted into one single ring when packed ring format is on. It is
>>> straight forward that ring operations can be accelerated by utilizing
>>> SIMD instructions.
>>>
>>> This patch set will introduce vectorized data path in vhost library. If
>>> vectorized option is on, operations like descs check, descs writeback,
>>> address translation will be accelerated by SIMD instructions. On skylake
>>> server, it can bring 6% performance gain in loopback case and around 4%
>>> performance gain in PvP case.
>>
>> IMHO, 4% gain on PVP is not a significant gain if we compare to the
>> added complexity. Moreover, I guess this is 4% gain with testpmd-based
>> PVP? If this is the case it may be even lower with OVS-DPDK PVP
>> benchmark, I will try to do a benchmark this week.
>>
> 
> Maxime, 
> I have observed around 3% gain with OVS-DPDK in first version. But the number is not reliable as datapath has been changed. 
> I will try again after fixed OVS integration issue with latest dpdk. 

Thanks for the information.

Also, wouldn't using AVX512 lower the CPU frequency?
If so, could it have an impact on the workload running on the other
CPUs?

Thanks,
Maxime

>> Thanks,
>> Maxime
>>
>>> Vhost application can choose whether using vectorized acceleration, just
>>> like external buffer feature. If platform or ring format not support
>>> vectorized function, vhost will fallback to use default batch function.
>>> There will be no impact in current data path.
>>>
>>> v3:
>>> * rename vectorized datapath file
>>> * eliminate the impact when avx512 disabled
>>> * dynamically allocate memory regions structure
>>> * remove unlikely hint for in_order
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> * add vIOMMU support
>>> * add dequeue offloading
>>> * rebase code
>>>
>>> Marvin Liu (5):
>>>   vhost: add vectorized data path
>>>   vhost: reuse packed ring functions
>>>   vhost: prepare memory regions addresses
>>>   vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue
>>>   vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue
>>>
>>>  doc/guides/nics/vhost.rst           |   5 +
>>>  doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst |  12 +
>>>  drivers/net/vhost/rte_eth_vhost.c   |  17 +-
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/meson.build        |  16 ++
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h        |   1 +
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/socket.c           |   5 +
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c            |  11 +
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h            | 239 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c       |  26 +++
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c       | 258 ++++-----------------
>>>  lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net_avx.c   | 344 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  11 files changed, 718 insertions(+), 216 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net_avx.c
>>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-12  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-19  3:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 " Marvin Liu
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] vhost: " Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] vhost " Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] vhost: " Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] vhost: reuse packed ring functions Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] vhost: prepare memory regions addresses Marvin Liu
2020-10-06 15:06       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue Marvin Liu
2020-10-06 14:59       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-08  7:05         ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-06 15:18       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-09  7:59         ` Liu, Yong
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue Marvin Liu
2020-10-06 15:00       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-08  7:09         ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-06 13:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-08  6:20       ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-09  8:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] vhost: " Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] vhost: reuse packed ring functions Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] vhost: prepare memory regions addresses Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue Marvin Liu
2020-10-12  8:21     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-12  9:10       ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-12  9:57         ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2020-10-12 13:24           ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-15 15:28       ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-15 15:35         ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/5] vhost: reuse packed ring functions Marvin Liu
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/5] vhost: prepare memory regions addresses Marvin Liu
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue Marvin Liu
2020-09-18 13:44   ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-09-21  6:26     ` Liu, Yong
2020-09-21  7:47       ` Liu, Yong
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue Marvin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7955df3a-d113-bd37-fa6f-77adac8e62c9@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=yong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git