From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AFF4F91 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:43:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Oct 2018 00:43:10 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,411,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="93942382" Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Oct 2018 00:43:10 -0700 Received: from irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.3) by IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:43:09 +0100 Received: from irsmsx103.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.248]) by irsmsx155.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.14.27]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 22 Oct 2018 08:43:08 +0100 From: "Parthasarathy, JananeeX M" To: "Pattan, Reshma" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "rsanford@akamai.com" Thread-Topic: [PATCH] test: reduce duration for timer autotest Thread-Index: AQHUUmv2ARw1C8Myrkab5SLSNyZmjqUYtdMAgBJYj/A= Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 07:43:08 +0000 Message-ID: <7AE31235A30B41498D1C31348DC858BD5B4D8F29@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1537617311-1092-1-git-send-email-jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com> <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F2A3B6F7E@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831F2A3B6F7E@irsmsx110.ger.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: reduce duration for timer autotest X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 07:43:13 -0000 Hi Reshma, >-----Original Message----- >From: Pattan, Reshma >Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 9:54 PM >To: Parthasarathy, JananeeX M ; >dev@dpdk.org >Cc: rsanford@akamai.com >Subject: RE: [PATCH] test: reduce duration for timer autotest > >Hi > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Parthasarathy, JananeeX M >> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2018 12:55 PM >> To: dev@dpdk.org >> Cc: Pattan, Reshma ; rsanford@akamai.com; >> Parthasarathy, JananeeX M >> Subject: [PATCH] test: reduce duration for timer autotest >> >> >> /* pick random timer to reset, stopping them first half the time */ >> - for (i =3D 0; i < 100000; i++) { >> + for (i =3D 0; i < NB_STRESS2_TIMERS; i++) { > >Just reduce the iteration to some number, instead of using macro >NB_STRESS2_TIMERS, which seem to be specific for number of timers. > >(Or) can this test be considered as perf ? and ignore above changes.? > >Any one any comments? > >Thanks, >Reshma > NB_STRESS2_TIMERS is used for all iterations in the test and timer structur= e is allocated NB_STRESS2_TIMERS only, hence used the same. This seems to be stress test so better to be considered as perf test and no= changes are required. Please let us know about it. Regards MP.Jananee -------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the s= ole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact = the sender and delete all copies.