From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B035680 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:55:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0111D8F4F6; Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.6.117] (vpn1-6-117.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.6.117]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9R9t6l8012068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 05:55:07 -0400 To: "Wang, Zhihong" , Yuanhan Liu , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "Pierre Pfister (ppfister)" References: <1474619303-16709-1-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> <1474965769-24782-1-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE09414E7CE6D1@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <70cc3b89-d680-1519-add3-f38b228e65b5@redhat.com> <20161017132121.GG16751@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE09414E7D8BDF@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin Message-ID: <7a987be6-feec-0639-211a-462cf2b44514@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:55:05 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "vkaplans@redhat.com" , "mst@redhat.com" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] vhost: Add indirect descriptors support to the TX path X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:55:11 -0000 On 10/27/2016 11:10 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > Hi Zhihong, > > On 10/27/2016 11:00 AM, Wang, Zhihong wrote: >> Hi Maxime, >> >> Seems indirect desc feature is causing serious performance >> degradation on Haswell platform, about 20% drop for both >> mrg=on and mrg=off (--txqflags=0xf00, non-vector version), >> both iofwd and macfwd. > I tested PVP (with macswap on guest) and Txonly/Rxonly on an Ivy Bridge > platform, and didn't faced such a drop. > Have you tried to pass indirect_desc=off to qemu cmdline to see if you > recover the performance? > > Yuanhan, which platform did you use when you tested it with zero copy? > >> >> I'm using RC2, and the CPU is Xeon E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz. >> >> Could you please verify if this is true in your test? > I'll try -rc1/-rc2 on my platform, and let you know. As a first test, I tried again Txonly from the guest to the host (Rxonly), where Tx indirect descriptors are used, on my E5-2665 @2.40GHz: v16.11-rc1: 10.81Mpps v16.11-rc2: 10.91Mpps -rc2 is even slightly better in my case. Could you please run the same test on your platform? And could you provide me more info on your fwd bench? Do you use dpdk-pktgen on host, or you do fwd on howt with a real NIC also? Thanks, Maxime > Thanks, > Maxime > >> >> >> Thanks >> Zhihong >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin@redhat.com] >>> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 10:15 PM >>> To: Yuanhan Liu >>> Cc: Wang, Zhihong ; Xie, Huawei >>> ; dev@dpdk.org; vkaplans@redhat.com; >>> mst@redhat.com; stephen@networkplumber.org >>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] vhost: Add indirect descriptors >>> support >>> to the TX path >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/17/2016 03:21 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: >>>> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:23:23PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >>>>>> On my side, I just setup 2 Windows 2016 VMs, and confirm the issue. >>>>>> I'll continue the investigation early next week. >>>>> >>>>> The root cause is identified. >>>>> When INDIRECT_DESC feature is negotiated, Windows guest uses indirect >>>>> for both Tx and Rx descriptors, whereas Linux guests (Virtio PMD & >>>>> virtio-net kernel driver) use indirect only for Tx. >>>>> I'll implement indirect support for the Rx path in vhost lib, but the >>>>> change will be too big for -rc release. >>>>> I propose in the mean time to disable INDIRECT_DESC feature in vhost >>>>> lib, we can still enable it locally for testing. >>>>> >>>>> Yuanhan, is it ok for you? >>>> >>>> That's okay. >>> I'll send a patch to disable it then. >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Has anyone already tested Windows guest with vhost-net, which also >>> has >>>>>> indirect descs support? >>>>> >>>>> I tested and confirm it works with vhost-net. >>>> >>>> I'm a bit confused then. IIRC, vhost-net also doesn't support indirect >>>> for Rx path, right? >>> >>> No, it does support it actually. >>> I thought it didn't support too, I misread the Kernel implementation of >>> vhost-net and virtio-net. Acutally, virtio-net makes use of indirect >>> in Rx path when mergeable buffers is disabled. >>> >>> The confusion certainly comes from me, sorry about that. >>> >>> Maxime