From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0CEA00C2; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 21:09:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20251410DC; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 21:09:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BDC40FAE for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 21:09:34 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1669320574; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ZW+wHeWIP18UoeIRfHk4Dtji6jY60GrOsw0VvnzEWtg=; b=bRigdDuHRw4nXmQsOlYrpBGrVvOoiVyJMvMjC7plH8sYMrllms/RzkyfoGTIyGX3sAttRr GhVafD18SmS0bh/4Dx2NIEyQCLMWjeqIZDv9gKCrrKouppWJvPw1vCeplYsAQ5tiZkShPW QeN+8FgZD1GTHX3elx0/giGRq45xoow= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-658-fwue8sTGMTKjtlssyOJAFw-1; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 15:09:31 -0500 X-MC-Unique: fwue8sTGMTKjtlssyOJAFw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3133D801585; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:09:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.25] (unknown [10.39.208.25]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2CB3C15BA5; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 20:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <7ef4430a-a66c-0c97-c138-15a4cb816602@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 21:09:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] test/bbdev: fix build issue with optional build flag To: Nicolas Chautru , dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, gakhil@marvell.com Cc: hernan.vargas@intel.com, Vipin.Varghese@amd.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, Ferruh.Yigit@amd.com, Clinton.France@amd.com References: <20221124160616.6161-1-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> <20221124160616.6161-2-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <20221124160616.6161-2-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.8 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 11/24/22 17:06, Nicolas Chautru wrote: > Incorrect bbdev member name used in test code under > RTE_BBDEV_OFFLOAD_COST build flag. > > Fixes: 4f08028c5e24 ("bbdev: expose queue related warning and status") > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru > --- > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c > index b285d3f3a7..1859952901 100644 > --- a/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c > +++ b/app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c > @@ -4933,8 +4933,8 @@ get_bbdev_queue_stats(uint16_t dev_id, uint16_t queue_id, > stats->dequeued_count = q_stats->dequeued_count; > stats->enqueue_err_count = q_stats->enqueue_err_count; > stats->dequeue_err_count = q_stats->dequeue_err_count; > - stats->enqueue_warning_count = q_stats->enqueue_warning_count; > - stats->dequeue_warning_count = q_stats->dequeue_warning_count; > + stats->enqueue_warn_count = q_stats->enqueue_warn_count; > + stats->dequeue_warn_count = q_stats->dequeue_warn_count; > stats->acc_offload_cycles = q_stats->acc_offload_cycles; > > return 0; Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin Thanks, Maxime