From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F41156 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 09:01:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id bz8so906009wib.5 for ; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 00:02:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=xrsTSZoS7PXbAnUEYlvJZ2fqfj+Fvo3Ryq12mkcKaCg=; b=iXuWkphKDrrdltRlfd9UQJcgP9/dcWc/xHyjV9AuVZnryMYE3VXhSMeX0rLXk1ktA9 XDqaTPY7ByvrSQedGFZ7TjxL6MxbbHxXNXPI9neSW8fJg7LWcGixcrnFwxnj2BWvjWB4 2UktpJqiCzLeOuIb8x2kCjtPgzV0YK+yIhPyWbCtAl58HtIgg7uP8t2vGGkz6zjBnkJF 6TDjUSlz1ZR8UPueMdqD1cRLzA/3rUgwuinvCNjwALuEUB+sVdeXZBPYsi++gz21U2Tk 2TwdzERkrYINk6oUFbqJzBYnH4ennsmV3U7yP/yFN+/LgEXHF3JZm+TnbCr2/2ujCL7t 59xg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnoa/wXvRzvfi0bEVZNCoUp3yX52JhWgA7CXCY+N2A/QWDNLwsK+UiIe2tJV2BZqiFioV/4 X-Received: by 10.180.38.35 with SMTP id d3mr8640746wik.2.1387094548628; Sun, 15 Dec 2013 00:02:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from x220.localnet (abo-107-62-68.mts.modulonet.fr. [85.68.62.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id mt2sm13951450wic.7.2013.12.15.00.02.27 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Dec 2013 00:02:27 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Romulo Rosa Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 09:02:25 +0100 Message-ID: <8208309.oeISgDEZBG@x220> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.11.4 (Linux/3.12.2-1-ARCH; KDE/4.11.4; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <52AB3176.7040800@windriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ovs] Problem with OVS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 08:01:23 -0000 14/12/2013 13:54, Romulo Rosa : > But i think my NICS are not supportted by Intel DPDK. In this link they are > not listed http://dpdk.org/doc/nics. Anyone know if there are other > supported cards? [...] > 0000:03:00.0 'NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe' if=eth0 > *drv=tg3* unused= > *Active* > 0000:03:00.1 'NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe' if=eth1 *drv=tg3* > unused= > 0000:03:00.2 'NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe' if=eth2 *drv=tg3* > unused= > 0000:03:00.3 'NetXtreme BCM5719 Gigabit Ethernet PCIe' if=eth3 *drv=tg3* > unused= > 0000:07:00.0 'OneConnect 10Gb NIC (be3)' if=eth4* drv=be2net* unused= > 0000:07:00.1 'OneConnect 10Gb NIC (be3)' if=eth5 *drv=be2net* unused= No, Broadcom and Emulex NICs are not supported. But patches are welcomed. By the way, you can use any NIC with pmd_pcap if you don't care about performance. -- Thomas