From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85A2A0A02; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:31:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207E540683; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:31:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD114067B for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:31:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD818E1B; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:31:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:31:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= s+7uRx3af8cmzdlu3HIwTzOM7OE7jWAp7//Hy5tgD20=; b=FDaM19dLt5rlYYIN FncvaoJNcIcpxljv/xXsJBGvXIDMpEr6zyCPwbkeVj5tFI3gU/4hg0V2k5XwnvlI JLNX2TyrCfv+RMTahr/PoRI9EfJFgm64iwtzdr/wuHdMwrstZIJiseUkJe8nF05O AnY8OSQsK/d9m6qoNZ0GOvBzscVFFHA7tdg7XHzUy7E/LtyKcKkjNaJbs1FgxH/y IisZRl2BP17hEVHBfuSAD/+PZoSgxdDXdKElzLbP1V/Nrn9MfuOkunNRaOxVEGxD /jJdX3oQSzfwDqV4vgT7MvOTfSyhwMYxAYA9cRIheCeioeva9rF+krLTL7W5KNMM ErDKNA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=s+7uRx3af8cmzdlu3HIwTzOM7OE7jWAp7//Hy5tgD 20=; b=vzdGJd2EnFA/gQ7IXdH47A6/kr6H0713t7AIkKvmQKQAThBrsMjXG31kK HY3dxO3EhD9X/WEjkC/ZYc7qBqFuVinqLddldkx3tk+J3qnGrF/N6dcYheHUDS9p 2zzWkghzLN3kVpY3QU3WnzMM3ekKrH5WNvuHo+F1fCZcrmT3naZ80HZaBs6o6OvR IZZr+hJGZCjGPnw/7kwFLePNXKlr04l8NKCJyP5EFhJvHAXUdlqEF0JiLQKOoVxQ yZASp+URGYXrwCk9ZlyKd0wD55sQ/jOEpk0CL2jX8+Ewvrli/I5zLxjxs7md+Dgp l3SCGnbd+rs42kCLCNlMq17i5zang== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudegjedguddvudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtuf ertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghs sehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfe eglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeuieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedr vddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfh hrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 787821080066; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 04:31:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Tyler Retzlaff Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:30:58 +0100 Message-ID: <8251456.Wk86ePSIJQ@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1616560011-31647-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: <1616560011-31647-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: standard c++ forbids defining the keyword asm as a macro X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 24/03/2021 05:26, Tyler Retzlaff: > +#ifndef __cplusplus > #ifndef asm > #define asm __asm__ > #endif > +#endif It requires more explanations. Which compilers do not define asm? What happens with C++ if asm is undefined?