From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3016A034F; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:27:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 099A71D736; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:27:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E051D735 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 14:27:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7625C0098; Wed, 6 May 2020 08:27:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 May 2020 08:27:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= bFzngrylQfofjtQ56aOrjMn7A3qfwsn0qrCSZsgJSA8=; b=wRrMzWrR7pe0gBSI OfVK151x86bbMKfGzpOv43Ct2KOHbLZ/e55R7NOa04w6DR4t5tHKY8R8jsNaecwt aHARSpH2CEdXFtUXG4x2eUx987YhZ3fUWkNBUl1MoulCWOuD9SKo/5WVQ0HQAZ7v /DtuW+ZJ0AsoeNQMOWuQ4ws97CT+S3biRVCd0Vu8vL9fw2QDBRnH65q1ZNR0OMmi ipgVB9HeFoY+ZZKcxAFg9xp9mC/En+5hN/buq+2JNDAkVDTQEpT0NPyoWFPtgHQ/ M/I1+T4MYrF84VQ1yT7pJwnyldrS8s8u9yoIhBOun7s9rDb1112Cityx0lxVm7x9 EEZNXA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=bFzngrylQfofjtQ56aOrjMn7A3qfwsn0qrCSZsgJS A8=; b=lakULHiNgiANFaaTYeEJ6kThKOSo1lRPDq7084wjcZXrDDDivNoUuAbCJ 0y/3DumB6d0oAaMoziG8FaoN7B4O6j0mPgt+Hrdzx7E96QqP/+Yf6lIQKuY1RFaa g/mHVO2RI67IgJIl+SZAZLuyhkcSE/4j3kawJetzsvNQMlC30JXEJs42fODC8VF3 hsbVizvi0V4G/X66nKgkMB99JtStoSv4ud5BPJkOQRLCSdFKklgkPlMBJbUaLtzg saz37+kaAk8AokjaTC67FFvJZ7AILQ0HpBS4rzQwUt8VtyaL3LWuhYSntssat9Lr dfMVv38I1pFJLsaBx0CNxbhOFYAmw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrjeekgdehtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 144EE3280067; Wed, 6 May 2020 08:27:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ray Kinsella , David Marchand Cc: Ophir Munk , dev@dpdk.org, Raslan Darawsheh , Matan Azrad , Neil Horman Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 14:27:44 +0200 Message-ID: <8275970.VV5PYv0bhD@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200505112057.20901-1-ophirmu@mellanox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/3] devtools: create internal ignore file for libabigail X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 05/05/2020 16:53, David Marchand: > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:21 PM Ophir Munk wrote: > > +; These functions were moved from stable to internal. > > +; This is a temporary exception till DPDK 20.11. > > This is not until 20.11 if we merge this patch now. > It is only when comparing 20.02 to 20.05. > After this, symbols will be marked INTERNAL and will be skipped by the > generic rule, so we can remove this exception in 20.08-rc0. I think we need to keep this rule until 20.11, because we want to ignore symbols which were in 19.11 and 20.02, and removed (as internal) in 20.05. If we remove this rule in 20.08, and comparing with 19.11, the tool will complain about removed symbols, isn't it?