From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74691569A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 03:16:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2015 18:16:48 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,543,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="646345249"
Received: from pgsmsx102.gar.corp.intel.com ([10.221.44.80])
 by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Sep 2015 18:16:47 -0700
Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.69) by
 PGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com (10.221.44.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.224.2; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:16:30 +0800
Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.179]) by
 SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.110]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:16:28 +0800
From: "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, "Mcnamara, John"
 <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev][PATCH v2]doc:Add performance test guide about how
 to get DPDK high perf on Intel platform
Thread-Index: AQHQ1XbszXEA6pT/Lk6pdblhngbl4J4+qA8A///YSQCAACfAAIAAJl0AgAFTYJA=
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:16:27 +0000
Message-ID: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E01DDD853@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1439435979-25869-1-git-send-email-qian.q.xu@intel.com>
 <2724688.VL6zfsszk2@xps13>
 <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE20233D3FA@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <2130384.etnPeQ8t8i@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <2130384.etnPeQ8t8i@xps13>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2]doc:Add performance test guide about how
 to get DPDK high perf on Intel platform
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:16:51 -0000

Thomas/John
Thanks a lot for your comments, and I will update the patch soon.=20

Thanks
Qian

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]=20
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 9:01 PM
To: Mcnamara, John
Cc: Xu, Qian Q; dev@dpdk.org; Jayakumar, Muthurajan
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev][PATCH v2]doc:Add performance test guide about how t=
o get DPDK high perf on Intel platform

2015-09-16 10:43, Mcnamara, John:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/doc/guides/perf_test_guide/index.rst
> >=20
> > Why creating a new guide?
> > Can it be included as a chapter of the Linux user guide?
>=20
> I think the subject is probably distinct enough to merit its own guide=20
> and it is more of an advanced topic than a getting started topic.

I think we should avoid creating too many guides.
This chapter is about using DPDK in Linux. Yes it is a bit more advanced th=
an the Linux QSG. So why not creating an advanced section?