From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83E8A00C5; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C1E42684; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:44:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E97E541109 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:44:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E19D5C00C8; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:44:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:44:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1657658684; x= 1657745084; bh=8NJKdsj32nOowN/pcpLD8HOZg5QSTAb2xRYohXx+hlI=; b=t edrVifIxceolqsQn+Clackue7KWfQSk7DtPy4140o7mwtQHvM/Lzc4OCY7/ieaat wl7TvmRq20+evSrdzNpxfhngQ8A1TwYnAnbz9XfLMSqZxe/r5/MUN0Inbh9+hC50 fK6dLvDWnJ43ywEJvUHOvIHyAprhGAu32uMdkj9w8x3BJeCCSe7hu36Z/dxrn4Jm htajrMAvH+Lr4mbQ47usz0AT0jJK/0/CSDVIB7wTdhUhhflG9OUtv/mCTqGd2MWu dIPfQwakCXUaQHPw0n/Fj6N/OqLejCrS886lEX9z1a8z59syFBREN4hoP9C4o1sE ultYIN5jLXUVk8uemrK6g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t=1657658684; x= 1657745084; bh=8NJKdsj32nOowN/pcpLD8HOZg5QSTAb2xRYohXx+hlI=; b=x PK9m6hZnnVNQAXQ/93tY5BUkgabLWv4qvnufwxQeirrxsKxcJrI+5GszpF9PXJx0 OAwW4geIABoWhGzDydCAe2YD/Zy8y+PiPWmdpsKesTmjmHpPp28wNMakNG3aMk51 jFic3imdz4fpNRVG1D7rn641rWi9PxjOv+6Y15ijpf+f60inWEfa2B1g8aSiDI1a xPzuqlIh9ppUlpW673pha8YbJwhDERrqEyI6MSbIhYmch2d/TTZB8KMG4QvF7/9X LIHdccshSUZGGKZB5eQyGY43XV0wMY7eK5kqRPS2pYm6j2NoA4HS4uqsjh4k6I7M DY6c1SZU8xHECETFMkqzA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrudejhedgudehhecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvfevufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhho mhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqne cuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjeejffffgfffkeefffelgfekleetjeffleeludeghfehleff teehveduffdugfdvnecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47234305:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:44:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Vamsi Krishna Attunuru , Akhil Goyal Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Vamsi Krishna Attunuru , "ferruh.yigit@intel.com" , Anoob Joseph , "mdr@ashroe.eu" Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] doc: announce addition of new ipsec event subtypes Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:44:41 +0200 Message-ID: <830136479.pAmPZ1aGmH@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20220624133551.365962-1-vattunuru@marvell.com> <6043248.xgNZFEDtJV@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 12/07/2022 17:30, Akhil Goyal: > > 27/06/2022 07:29, Vamsi Attunuru: > > > New event subtypes need to be added for notifying expiry events > > > upon reaching IPsec SA soft packet expiry and hard packet/byte > > > expiry limits. This would be added in DPDK 22.11. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vamsi Attunuru > > > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal > > > --- > > > More details on new event subtype proposal discussion are in below email > > thread. > > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220416192530.173895-8-gakhil@marvell.com/> > > > > v2: rephrase title and git log. > > > --- > > > +* ethdev: The enum ``rte_eth_event_ipsec_subtype`` would be extended to > > add > > > + new subtype values ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_PKT_EXPIRY``, > > > + ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_BYTE_HARD_EXPIRY`` and > > > + ``RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_SA_PKT_HARD_EXPIRY`` in DPDK 22.11. > > > > While at it, would you consider avoiding future ABI breakage > > with RTE_ETH_EVENT_IPSEC_MAX? > > For MAX values there is already a generic notice. Do you want to mention this here as well? > IMO, it is not required. We can work on it, but do not need explicit mention here. OK I forgot we had already a generic notice.