From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9CE423FB; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 11:49:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EEE42D18; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 11:49:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBB3410DD for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 11:49:43 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1673952582; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3jmPDM+4nO/2lEpvEus2hPqan1dhyn1WPe+oKyc9xZk=; b=EfxPNVQUZu6ZJX5ASzGw6GOcPVlgzipwH1NHtDLJBtLUZlV92l3xEzEQniAb2PTfu2dWk7 A402TYHZmT7UsKmlL/mON6irEg81iLgRxNTKIMowzARtYB1TUMoRWF+uNIzVF0t4gFwrNI WrJ4B48AWcdYvcnNabsxh1Af0c6PYBc= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-473-3SbuZ-C5NJ2ZvHliFpVSkg-1; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 05:49:41 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 3SbuZ-C5NJ2ZvHliFpVSkg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 266B5101A55E; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.23] (unknown [10.39.208.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 999551121315; Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <842e4598-c951-ac66-1dd9-aaf33179d089@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 11:49:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] baseband/acc: acc100 fix iteration counter in TB To: Hernan Vargas , dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com, trix@redhat.com Cc: nicolas.chautru@intel.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org References: <20230112193609.273578-1-hernan.vargas@intel.com> <20230112193609.273578-3-hernan.vargas@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <20230112193609.273578-3-hernan.vargas@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 1/12/23 20:36, Hernan Vargas wrote: > Use ldpc or turbo iteration counter based on the operation type. > > Fixes: 5ad5060f8f7 ("baseband/acc100: add LDPC processing functions") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Hernan Vargas > --- > drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c > index 146a22bd64..a00314c957 100644 > --- a/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c > +++ b/drivers/baseband/acc/rte_acc100_pmd.c > @@ -4033,8 +4033,12 @@ dequeue_dec_one_op_tb(struct acc_queue *q, struct rte_bbdev_dec_op **ref_op, > /* CRC invalid if error exists */ > if (!op->status) > op->status |= rsp.crc_status << RTE_BBDEV_CRC_ERROR; > - op->turbo_dec.iter_count = RTE_MAX((uint8_t) rsp.iter_cnt, > - op->turbo_dec.iter_count); > + if (q->op_type == RTE_BBDEV_OP_LDPC_DEC) > + op->ldpc_dec.iter_count = RTE_MAX((uint8_t) rsp.iter_cnt, > + op->ldpc_dec.iter_count); > + else > + op->turbo_dec.iter_count = RTE_MAX((uint8_t) rsp.iter_cnt, > + op->turbo_dec.iter_count); > > /* Check if this is the last desc in batch (Atomic Queue) */ > if (desc->req.last_desc_in_batch) { Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin Thanks, Maxime