From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E1F4CA7 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 15:57:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Aug 2018 06:57:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,295,1531810800"; d="scan'208";a="69454462" Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Aug 2018 06:57:15 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 06:57:15 -0700 Received: from shsmsx103.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.4.240]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.143]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 21:57:13 +0800 From: "Liu, Yong" To: Luca Boccassi , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "thomas@monjalon.net" , "Yigit, Ferruh" Thread-Topic: [PATCH v2] examples: fix ip_reassembly not work with some NICs Thread-Index: AQHUPgjB1FvYMwnUEUSpoH8/IxVqoKTTndvQ Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:57:12 +0000 Message-ID: <86228AFD5BCD8E4EBFD2B90117B5E81E6312D6AD@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1485156509-4919-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com> <20180827132023.6566-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20180827132023.6566-1-luca.boccassi@gmail.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMWE0NDkzMTAtZTNkMC00N2ZhLWE2ODktNjZkNTBiODExMWYxIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiNERVV1hEa1M0R2hqcTgwV0hrUWpwZTU1SGE3TEk0V3JINW40WVdqXC9jUHlTOEdlNVUyNkhoRmp5QkJQcVhOS2IifQ== x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] examples: fix ip_reassembly not work with some NICs X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:57:17 -0000 Boccassi, Packet type is supported in both vector and normal Rx functions of Fortvill= e pmd. So I think this patch was superseded because of it do not fix the re= al issue. Thanks, Marvin > -----Original Message----- > From: Luca Boccassi [mailto:luca.boccassi@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 9:20 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Liu, Yong ; thomas@monjalon.net; Yigit, Ferruh > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] examples: fix ip_reassembly not work with some NI= Cs >=20 > Hi Thomas and Yong, >=20 > This patch: >=20 > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/19868/ >=20 > Fixes an error in the Intel regression tests when backported to the > 16.11.x LTS branch, but was never committed to master. > It's marked as superseded, and the error does not appear on master. >=20 > Do you remember what other change superseded this patch? I can't > find anything on the mailing list. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 > Kind regards, > Luca Boccassi