From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B368E89 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:46:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so189749007wic.0 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 05:46:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=t7vq4H14md2XraMppb5vF8ojbAEH4TrVszXWpoewzvM=; b=ZkHUnqNG9YkCeqqzNSscqouxp4EU0ezlrzMpE7M3lWRsNmSUoTeIvxRjlnZ+BER4Gr GMbdDJzW87R7jl4wGortYvDU68d6gcI2UNd1U/tLxdFE4usBfWnk+l0wiCt0AT295+rn 7FOcFBe7nUisH+62oRW4aE2owUzjzoHfRrw4dJ8fdKiKuAZT0uTr3ks+Sd7pFeRhwZl5 k9gB5hN3BjAqGWjKFJyy+8jbxTs4YgAq9fbIRO96jF6CFX/xDk5YNzGBoGzYA5yn9Bd9 J6OYzsoUqO0NRETUTZey9DbU2QSVL9rl+hXw/J1qrXr2TkUe/SsN934YcVgPB2DX3EQP YA4g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmVo6FVi/T3+U83gQzWW21Xd7AJ4h4xSI2kqsxM6G6/+fEqacU4mqN7fCqhlW8ovpKm/V1Q X-Received: by 10.194.20.68 with SMTP id l4mr41586909wje.24.1444740375170; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 05:46:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gt4sm14897476wib.21.2015.10.13.05.46.14 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Oct 2015 05:46:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Simon =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=E5gstr=F6m?= Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:45:11 +0200 Message-ID: <8756629.OFYVJTNzJr@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <561CFB9C.5080708@netinsight.net> References: <20150924094328.5a2ea3c8@miho> <561CF892.9040507@6wind.com> <561CFB9C.5080708@netinsight.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: Quote $(KERNELCC) to allow ccache builds X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:46:16 -0000 2015-10-13 14:39, Simon K=E5gstr=F6m: > On 2015-10-13 14:26, Olivier MATZ wrote: > > There is the patchwork tool: > > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/project/dpdk/list/ >=20 > Thanks! I knew about it, but forgot to look there. It would be nice t= o > have tags to signify e.g., for-v2.2, candidate-v2.2 etc. like you can= > have on github to easier see where patches are going, but perhaps > patchwork doesn't work that way. No it's not needed currently because every patches in this mailing-list= target an integration in the main branch for the next release. Exceptions must be notified. > Is the process to ping old patches like this on the mailing list? Yes it is the responsibility of the developer and the maintainer to get= reviews. Please check in the MAINTAINERS file who to contact. > Two of the patches (this one included) I have outstanding are build f= ixes > for use in our build environment, so it would be nice to them upstrea= med. Waiting for integration of your patches, maybe you have some free time = to help other developers by making reviews ;) Thanks