DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: tiwei.bie@intel.com, Gavin.Hu@arm.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/8] net/virtio: implement transmit path for packed queues
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:31:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8772e063-9d04-be01-51a4-567665908505@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181003131118.21491-6-jfreimann@redhat.com>


I'm testing your series, and it gets stuck after 256 packets in transmit
path. When it happens, descs flags indicate it has been made available
by the driver (desc->flags = 0x80), but it is not consistent with the
expected wrap counter value (0).

Not sure this is the root cause, but it seems below code is broken:

On 10/03/2018 03:11 PM, Jens Freimann wrote:
> +static inline void
> +virtqueue_enqueue_xmit_packed(struct virtnet_tx *txvq, struct rte_mbuf *cookie,
> +			uint16_t needed, int use_indirect, int can_push,
> +			int in_order)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_tx_region *txr = txvq->virtio_net_hdr_mz->addr;
> +	struct vq_desc_extra *dxp, *head_dxp;
> +	struct virtqueue *vq = txvq->vq;
> +	struct vring_desc_packed *start_dp, *head_dp;
> +	uint16_t seg_num = cookie->nb_segs;
> +	uint16_t idx, head_id;
> +	uint16_t head_size = vq->hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
> +	struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr;
> +	int wrap_counter = vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter;
> +
> +	head_id = vq->vq_desc_head_idx;
> +	idx = head_id;	
> +	start_dp = vq->vq_ring.desc_packed;
> +	dxp = &vq->vq_descx[idx];
> +	dxp->ndescs = needed;
> +
> +	head_dp = &vq->vq_ring.desc_packed[head_id];
> +	head_dxp = &vq->vq_descx[head_id];
> +	head_dxp->cookie = (void *) cookie;
> +
> +	if (can_push) {
> +		/* prepend cannot fail, checked by caller */
> +		hdr = (struct virtio_net_hdr *)
> +			rte_pktmbuf_prepend(cookie, head_size);
> +		/* rte_pktmbuf_prepend() counts the hdr size to the pkt length,
> +		 * which is wrong. Below subtract restores correct pkt size.
> +		 */
> +		cookie->pkt_len -= head_size;
> +
> +		/* if offload disabled, it is not zeroed below, do it now */
> +		if (!vq->hw->has_tx_offload) {
> +			ASSIGN_UNLESS_EQUAL(hdr->csum_start, 0);
> +			ASSIGN_UNLESS_EQUAL(hdr->csum_offset, 0);
> +			ASSIGN_UNLESS_EQUAL(hdr->flags, 0);
> +			ASSIGN_UNLESS_EQUAL(hdr->gso_type, 0);
> +			ASSIGN_UNLESS_EQUAL(hdr->gso_size, 0);
> +			ASSIGN_UNLESS_EQUAL(hdr->hdr_len, 0);
> +		}
> +	} else if (use_indirect) {
> +		/* setup tx ring slot to point to indirect
> +		 * descriptor list stored in reserved region.
> +		 *
> +		 * the first slot in indirect ring is already preset
> +		 * to point to the header in reserved region
> +		 */
> +		start_dp[idx].addr  = txvq->virtio_net_hdr_mem +
> +			RTE_PTR_DIFF(&txr[idx].tx_indir_pq, txr);
> +		start_dp[idx].len   = (seg_num + 1) * sizeof(struct vring_desc_packed);
> +		start_dp[idx].flags = VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT;
> +		hdr = (struct virtio_net_hdr *)&txr[idx].tx_hdr;
> +
> +		/* loop below will fill in rest of the indirect elements */
> +		start_dp = txr[idx].tx_indir_pq;
> +		idx = 1;
> +	} else {
> +		/* setup first tx ring slot to point to header
> +		 * stored in reserved region.
> +		 */
> +		start_dp[idx].addr  = txvq->virtio_net_hdr_mem +
> +			RTE_PTR_DIFF(&txr[idx].tx_hdr, txr);
> +		start_dp[idx].len   = vq->hw->vtnet_hdr_size;
> +		start_dp[idx].flags = VRING_DESC_F_NEXT;
> +		start_dp[idx].flags |=
> +			VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL(vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter) |
> +			VRING_DESC_F_USED(!vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter);
> +		hdr = (struct virtio_net_hdr *)&txr[idx].tx_hdr;
> +		idx = dxp->next;
> +	}
> +
> +	virtqueue_xmit_offload(hdr, cookie, vq->hw->has_tx_offload);
> +
> +	do {
> +		if (idx >= vq->vq_nentries) {
> +			idx = 0;
> +			vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter ^= 1;
> +		}
> +		start_dp[idx].addr  = VIRTIO_MBUF_DATA_DMA_ADDR(cookie, vq);
> +		start_dp[idx].len   = cookie->data_len;
> +		start_dp[idx].flags = cookie->next ? VRING_DESC_F_NEXT : 0;
> +		start_dp[idx].flags |=
> +			VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL(vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter) |
> +			VRING_DESC_F_USED(!vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter);
> +		if (use_indirect) {
> +			if (++idx >= (seg_num + 1))
> +				break;
> +		} else {
> +			dxp = &vq->vq_descx[idx];
> +			idx = dxp->next;
> +		}

Imagine current idx is 255, dxp->next will give idx 0, right?
In that case, for desc[0], on next iteration, the flags won't be set 
available properly, as vq->vq_ring.avail_wrap_counter isn't updated.

I'm not sure how it could work like this, shouldn't dxp save the wrap
counter value in out-of-order case?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-11 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-03 13:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/8] implement packed virtqueues Jens Freimann
2018-10-03 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/8] net/virtio: vring init for packed queues Jens Freimann
2018-10-04 11:54   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-05  8:10     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-03 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/8] net/virtio: add packed virtqueue defines Jens Freimann
2018-10-04 11:54   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-03 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/8] net/virtio: add packed virtqueue helpers Jens Freimann
2018-10-03 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/8] net/virtio: dump packed virtqueue data Jens Freimann
2018-10-04 13:23   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-03 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/8] net/virtio: implement transmit path for packed queues Jens Freimann
2018-10-10  7:27   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-10 11:43     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-11 17:31   ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2018-10-12  7:24     ` Jens Freimann
2018-10-12  7:41       ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-03 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/8] net/virtio: implement receive " Jens Freimann
2018-10-03 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 7/8] net/virtio: add virtio send command packed queue support Jens Freimann
2018-10-03 13:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 8/8] net/virtio: enable packed virtqueues by default Jens Freimann
2018-10-03 13:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/8] implement packed virtqueues Jens Freimann
2018-10-04 13:59 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8772e063-9d04-be01-51a4-567665908505@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).