From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1859358D0 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 23:42:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l18so3143637wgh.14 for ; Thu, 08 May 2014 14:42:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=XUIxUzo0C4ZZD/EW+73bOBU0YTpP0wh+E2YjIYUBTvc=; b=Ro4X4hUr9f3U34qcnpIzvkiY2gxykfUzSPj/K2qBzkTVoGD+88csULnLQGibm3ot3u uvPdNxu2hdw5oNfs4fAI36LXGNB5BgtpfC4AY+XNMkyrt4fZYWO344vnuU7mIsqe9KSv goE8gMHPuCVt5nY98tZhkSct+7UtAIWrwDbr7Kve+BVdCTqDl9LPH3FfXYC+3aGZm0FY Ku7BhICXtetWeGzD4SzeB3T0WaiH2wqFqTpAscVST/vpWJU/bpSFNn3f5gwWQlf/lW70 hEQATgWUV/AJYbSXqA3+yjItox5uRF2cMEevmyyXxxmEL28XQK4CF1Fj0vlB5824evMj UUHw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkNoOU7lkHl/p5Qk5HlIYuK78++I3MX4k2M0JqOrXkHWm0rrVnKTHC5L4lP2Vj93WiKRM2A X-Received: by 10.180.77.8 with SMTP id o8mr118540wiw.23.1399585327142; Thu, 08 May 2014 14:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (ip-96.net-80-236-123.rev.numericable.fr. [80.236.123.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fi2sm1438178wic.15.2014.05.08.14.42.05 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 08 May 2014 14:42:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Sanford, Robert" Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 23:42:02 +0200 Message-ID: <8858820.pzz9KGdcSJ@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.13 (Linux/3.14.2-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] malloc: fix rte_free run time in O(n) free blocks X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 21:42:01 -0000 Hi Robert, 2014-05-08 16:17, Sanford, Robert: > I haven't heard anything regarding this patch. > In general, how does your team keep track of outstanding patch requests or > RFCs? If nobody complains, it means that everybody agree on the idea. So it should be accepted after review. Some patches like this one are not yet reviewed because efforts were focused on release 1.6.0r2. This enhancement must be integrated in 1.7.0. I know that patchwork service is desired and I hope it will be available soon. By the way, looking at librte_malloc, it seems implementation of lists could be simpler. Don't you think we could improve (in another patch) this whole code by using BSD macros for lists? Thanks -- Thomas