From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF90E5A8A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:04:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23])
 by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2015 03:04:55 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,594,1427785200"; d="scan'208";a="725233872"
Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.153])
 by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2015 03:04:53 -0700
Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.59]) by
 IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.217]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002;
 Thu, 11 Jun 2015 11:04:53 +0100
From: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, "linville@tuxdriver.com"
 <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] deadline notice
Thread-Index: AQHQo60KqHfCcEacWE+dW5i0Q1WveJ2nCVcw///414CAABIQcA==
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:04:52 +0000
Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C204A2E551@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <2520130.3p9lvqUWmZ@xps13>
 <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C204A2E521@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
 <159365803.3qspsHhf2U@xps13>
In-Reply-To: <159365803.3qspsHhf2U@xps13>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] deadline notice
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 10:04:56 -0000



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 10:58 AM
> To: Iremonger, Bernard; linville@tuxdriver.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] deadline notice
>=20
> 2015-06-11 09:30, Iremonger, Bernard:
> > The following patch was submitted on 10th March 2015, but does not seem
> to be on   DPDK patchwork.
> >
> > [dpdk-dev] [RFC] af_packet: support port hotplug
>=20
> Good catch. It was classified as RFC:
> 	http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/3963/
>=20
> A v2 should be sent.
>=20
> Note: [RFC] should be preferred for incomplete patches or trials.

Hi Thomas,

Should RFC PATCH be retained for v2 and subsequent patches or should RFC be=
 dropped?

Regards,

Bernard.