From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E110A10 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2015 01:02:13 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,477,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="747592842" Received: from irsmsx106.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.31]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2015 01:01:51 -0700 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.201]) by IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.8.121]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 09:01:50 +0100 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" To: "Ouyang, Changchun" , "dev@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [PATCH 4/5] virtio: free queue memory in virtio_dev_close() Thread-Index: AQHQvjaW136Y3FNdc0SUiCYaM22MYp3bwGswgABrjoA= Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:01:50 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C204A48FD6@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1436879459-18400-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1436879459-18400-5-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] virtio: free queue memory in virtio_dev_close() X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:02:16 -0000 Hi Ouyang, > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c > > @@ -438,6 +438,24 @@ virtio_dev_cq_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev > > *dev, uint16_t vtpci_queue_idx, } > > > > static void > > +virtio_free_queues(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) { > > + unsigned int i; > > + > > + for (i =3D 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) { > > + virtio_dev_rx_queue_release(dev->data->rx_queues[i]); > > + dev->data->rx_queues[i] =3D NULL; > > + } > > + dev->data->nb_rx_queues =3D 0; > > + > > + for (i =3D 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) { > > + virtio_dev_tx_queue_release(dev->data->tx_queues[i]); > > + dev->data->tx_queues[i] =3D NULL; > > + } > > + dev->data->nb_tx_queues =3D 0; > > +} > > + > > +static void > > virtio_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) { > > struct virtio_hw *hw =3D dev->data->dev_private; @@ -451,6 +469,7 > @@ > > virtio_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > > vtpci_reset(hw); > > hw->started =3D 0; > > virtio_dev_free_mbufs(dev); > > + virtio_free_queues(dev); >=20 > Validate it with vhost sample or not for this change? I have tested this change with testpmd on a Fedora VM. Regards, Bernard. >=20 > > } > > > > static void > > -- > > 1.9.1