From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4355681 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:44:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2015 01:44:52 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,607,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="570371348" Received: from irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.155]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2015 01:44:51 -0700 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.216]) by IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.160]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:43:52 +0100 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" To: Stephen Hemminger Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 15/20] bnx2x: copy pci device info to eth_dev data Thread-Index: AQHQ+ieiaiDrepQdOUOfL0Cvm3SPEJ5TMP8A Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:43:52 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219F62886@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1443445418-18498-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1443445418-18498-16-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <20150928125519.75496585@urahara> In-Reply-To: <20150928125519.75496585@urahara> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 15/20] bnx2x: copy pci device info to eth_dev data X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 08:44:54 -0000 Hi Stephen, > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:03:33 +0100 > Bernard Iremonger wrote: >=20 > > /* > > * Copyright (c) 2013-2015 Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. > > + * Copyright(c) 2015 Intel Corporation. > > * > > * All rights reserved. > > */ >=20 > I agree with others, you can't claim copyright until you have made > substantive changes. At one point a lawyer told me that had to be 10% of = the > code. I thought it was necessary to add the copyright line because I had modified= the code. I will remove it in the next revision of the patch set. Regards, Bernard.