From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE5EA2F for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:44:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2015 08:44:14 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,234,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="592617943" Received: from irsmsx153.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.75]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Nov 2015 08:44:04 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.138]) by IRSMSX153.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.9.191]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:44:03 +0000 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/28] librte_ether: add fields from rte_pci_driver to rte_eth_dev_data Thread-Index: AQHRFOouZX+PM6tUz0GbZHUpEC9x/J6IhI2ggABppACAAAF5MA== Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:44:02 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219F7716B@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1446217733-9887-3-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1583512.Ss2AELHNGg@xps13> <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219F76F86@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> <22264893.CRHp7yC71q@xps13> In-Reply-To: <22264893.CRHp7yC71q@xps13> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/28] librte_ether: add fields from rte_pci_driver to rte_eth_dev_data X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 16:44:46 -0000 Hi Thomas, > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/28] librte_ether: add fields from > rte_pci_driver to rte_eth_dev_data >=20 > 2015-11-02 10:36, Iremonger, Bernard: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > > 2015-10-30 15:08, Bernard Iremonger: > > > > add dev_flags to rte_eth_dev_data, add macros for dev_flags. > > > > add kdrv to rte_eth_dev_data. > > > > add numa_node to rte_eth_dev_data. > > > > add drv_name to rte_eth_dev_data. > > > > > > A commit message should explain why things are done. > > > > > > > + uint32_t dev_flags; /**< Flags controlling handling of device. > > > > +*/ > > > > > > Where are defined this flags? What is the scope? > > > > These flags are defined in the following file: > > > > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h > > > > These flags are visible to all the vdevs and pdevs. >=20 > I mean it should be more explicit. Having an enum name will help. > Note: I understand your patch. I'm just asking the questions an user will= ask > when trying to use your new API. > Thanks I will try to be clearer in the commit message. I tried an enum for the dev_flags but it does not work well. There can be multiple flags set in dev_flags, it is intended to be a bit fi= eld similar to the pci flags. I have squashed down to 19 patches now, I don't want to over squash. Regards, Bernard. =20