From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF053C342 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:26:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2016 02:26:58 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,464,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="915659334" Received: from irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.28]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Feb 2016 02:26:56 -0800 Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.102]) by irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.237]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:26:53 +0000 From: "Iremonger, Bernard" To: Stephen Hemminger Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] bond: handle slaves with fewer queues than bonding device Thread-Index: AQHRXpa/lzfjNp16NUmxTufHkB0LOJ8xr0vw Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:26:53 +0000 Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C219FB2C51@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1449249260-15165-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20160203112854.GA13036@bricha3-MOBL3> <56B219EF.7040105@intel.com> <2402415.75bQrkATMT@xps13> In-Reply-To: <2402415.75bQrkATMT@xps13> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYzc3MmNkMTAtODUzZS00OWRkLWEyZjMtMzYzMDY1OTdkNjc0IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6Im1BYXVONlp5cHYydEpnN3Fjc2xoMDNnMDVTYzhDdHdmZHNxYUpkTE1xUWM9In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.180] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] bond: handle slaves with fewer queues than bonding device X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:27:00 -0000 Hi Stephen, > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 3:21 PM > To: Doherty, Declan > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] bond: handle slaves with fewer queues > than bonding device >=20 > 2016-02-03 15:17, Declan Doherty: > > On 03/02/16 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > Hi Eric, Stephen, Declan, > > > > > > all patches of the set apart from this one and the next (nos 6 & 7) > > > have no comments and have been acked. Is there a resolution on these > > > two patches, so they can be acked and merged? > > > > Hey Bruce, Eric, Stephen, sorry about leaving this patchset hanging > > around. Can you apply patches 1-5 & patch 8 in this patch set. I've > > reviewed and acked all of those patches and I believe they are good > > tof go. I need to give further feedback on patches 6 and 7, as I would > > like to avoid bring further rte_ring buffering into the bonded device > > if possible and I think this should be possible but I haven't had time > > to prototype any alternatives but that shouldn't stop the other > > patches being applied. >=20 > Picking some patches in a series makes tracking confusing. > The better solution is to re-send the series with only the desired patche= s. > When re-sending, do not forget to embed the acks from the previous > version, thanks. Could you send a V2 of this patch set without patches 6 and 7. The other 6 patches have been acked already. Regards, Bernard.