From: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
To: Wisam Monther <wisamm@mellanox.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>,
"rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com" <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] app/testpmd: fix ports list after removing several at once
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:22:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260D12E08@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR05MB18741E0F6086AA963A1942F0A9F80@AM4PR05MB1874.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Wisam,
From: Wisam Monther [mailto:wisamm@mellanox.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 12:49 PM
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Iremonger, Bernard <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>; arybchenko@solarflare.com; Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>; rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com
Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] app/testpmd: fix ports list after removing several at once
Are we saving cycles by set it to be <= instead of < _ +1?
No idea, just looks cleaner to me.
BRs,
Wisam Jaddo
<snip>
Regards,
Bernard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-18 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-07 23:39 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: complete closing to free all resources Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-10 8:03 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-09-10 8:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-10 8:54 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-09-12 14:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-12 15:44 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-09-28 12:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-09 22:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-09 22:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10 6:15 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10 7:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10 7:50 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10 8:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10 15:01 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10 16:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10 18:01 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10 19:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-14 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] ethdev port freeing Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-14 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 11:16 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-16 12:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 12:47 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-16 12:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 12:55 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-14 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 11:24 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-16 12:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev port freeing Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 2:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 6:26 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17 8:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 10:30 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-17 11:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 7:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17 8:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] ethdev: remove release function for secondary process Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 7:25 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17 9:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 1:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 2:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 10:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev port freeing Shreyansh Jain
2018-10-17 11:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 1:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/6] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 1:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/6] app/testpmd: fix ports list after removing several at once Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 10:40 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 11:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 11:41 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 14:21 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 16:42 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 11:49 ` Wisam Monther
2018-10-18 13:22 ` Iremonger, Bernard [this message]
2018-10-18 1:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/6] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 7:45 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 10:51 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 11:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 1:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/6] ethdev: fix doxygen comments of shared data fields Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 7:11 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 1:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/6] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 7:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 1:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/6] ethdev: remove release function for secondary process Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 7:15 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 1:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/6] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 8:33 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 9:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] ethdev port freeing Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/6] app/testpmd: update port list for multiple removals Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 14:32 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/6] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 14:32 ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/6] ethdev: fix doxygen comments of shared data fields Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/6] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/6] ethdev: remove release function for secondary process Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 2:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/6] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 10:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-22 15:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/6] ethdev port freeing Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260D12E08@IRSMSX107.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=ophirmu@mellanox.com \
--cc=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=wisamm@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).