DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] test/ipsec: fix test suite setup function
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:35:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260D50AF4@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260D508D2@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>

Hi Konstantin,

<snip>

> > > Subject: [PATCH v2] test/ipsec: fix test suite setup function
> > >
> > > Check for valid crypto_null device before continuing.
> > > Use valid_dev instead of valid_devs[].
> > > Call create_crypto_session for one driver only.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 05fe65eb66b2 ("test/ipsec: introduce functional test")
> > > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  test/test/test_ipsec.c | 91
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> > >  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/test/test/test_ipsec.c b/test/test/test_ipsec.c index
> > > ff1a1c4..a5c1c4b 100644
> > > --- a/test/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > +++ b/test/test/test_ipsec.c
> > > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct ipsec_testsuite_params {
> > >  	struct rte_cryptodev_config conf;
> > >  	struct rte_cryptodev_qp_conf qp_conf;
> > >
> > > -	uint8_t valid_devs[RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS];
> > > +	uint8_t valid_dev;
> > >  	uint8_t valid_dev_count;
> > >  };
> > >
> > > @@ -218,8 +218,9 @@ testsuite_setup(void)  {
> > >  	struct ipsec_testsuite_params *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
> > >  	struct rte_cryptodev_info info;
> > > -	uint32_t nb_devs, dev_id;
> > > +	uint32_t i, nb_devs, dev_id;
> > >  	size_t sess_sz;
> > > +	int driver_id;
> > >
> > >  	memset(ts_params, 0, sizeof(*ts_params));
> > >
> > > @@ -251,10 +252,24 @@ testsuite_setup(void)
> > >  		return TEST_FAILED;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > > -	ts_params->valid_devs[ts_params->valid_dev_count++] = 0;
> > > +	driver_id = rte_cryptodev_driver_id_get(
> > > +			RTE_STR(CRYPTODEV_NAME_NULL_PMD));
> >
> >
> > I still think that guessing device capabilities by driver name is not
> > a right approach.
> > Please use check_device_capabilites() here.
> 
> Ok, this will require some refactoring of the tests.

I will refactor test_ipsec.c
 
> > > +
> > > +	/* Find first valid crypto device */
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < nb_devs; i++) {
> > > +		rte_cryptodev_info_get(i, &info);
> > > +		if (info.driver_id == driver_id) {
> > > +			ts_params->valid_dev = i;
> > > +			ts_params->valid_dev_count++;
> >
> > As you use only one device now, I don't think you need valid_dev_count
> > any more.
> 
> I will check if it is still needed.

Still need to know that a  valid device has been found.
I will rename valid_dev_count to valid_dev_found.

> 
> > > +			break;
> > > +		}
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (ts_params->valid_dev_count < 1)
> > > +		return TEST_FAILED;
> > >
> 
> <snip>

I will send a v3 patch.

 Regards,
 
 Bernard.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-17 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-15 11:19 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Bernard Iremonger
2019-01-15 11:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-15 12:34   ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-01-15 12:49     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-17 10:04       ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-01-17 10:30         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-17 11:12           ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-01-17 10:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Bernard Iremonger
2019-01-17 10:34   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-17 11:20     ` Iremonger, Bernard
2019-01-17 15:35       ` Iremonger, Bernard [this message]
2019-01-17 16:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Bernard Iremonger
2019-01-17 17:05     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-01-17 23:30       ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C260D50AF4@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).