From: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>
To: "ruifeng.wang@arm.com" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
"yipeng1.wang@intel.com" <yipeng1.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com" <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"nd@arm.com" <nd@arm.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v1] hash: optimize signature compare by using neon intrinsic
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 07:49:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c27de0eb69bc17562e64f977044f59cb7169770.camel@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190211073001.37438-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
On Mon, 2019-02-11 at 15:30 +0800, Ruifeng Wang wrote:
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> Implemented signature compare function based on neon intrinsic.
> Hash bulk lookup had 3% - 6% performance gain after optimization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 32
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> index c01489ba5..5745a254f 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
> #include <rte_spinlock.h>
> #include <rte_ring.h>
> #include <rte_compat.h>
> +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> +#include <arm_neon.h>
> +#endif
The use of rte_vector.h will remove the need for #if defined...
>
> #include "rte_hash.h"
> #include "rte_cuckoo_hash.h"
> @@ -407,6 +410,10 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters
> *params)
> if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_SSE2))
> h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE;
> else
> +#elif defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
> + if (rte_cpu_get_flag_enabled(RTE_CPUFLAG_NEON))
> + h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON;
> + else
> #endif
> h->sig_cmp_fn = RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SCALAR;
>
> @@ -1578,10 +1585,15 @@ compare_signatures(uint32_t
> *prim_hash_matches, uint32_t *sec_hash_matches,
> enum rte_hash_sig_compare_function sig_cmp_fn)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> +#ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON
> + uint16x8_t vmat, vsig, x;
> + uint64x2_t x64;
> + int16x8_t shift = {-15, -13, -11, -9, -7, -5, -3, -1};
> +#endif
Is it possible move down the variable declaration? to avoid the need
for #ifdef here
>
> /* For match mask the first bit of every two bits indicates the
> match */
> switch (sig_cmp_fn) {
> -#ifdef RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE2
> +#if defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_SSE2)
> case RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE:
> /* Compare all signatures in the bucket */
> *prim_hash_matches = _mm_movemask_epi8(_mm_cmpeq_epi16(
> @@ -1594,6 +1606,24 @@ compare_signatures(uint32_t
> *prim_hash_matches, uint32_t *sec_hash_matches,
> (__m128i const *)sec_bkt-
> >sig_current),
> _mm_set1_epi16(sig)));
> break;
> +#elif defined(RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON)
> + case RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON:
> + vsig = vld1q_dup_u16((uint16_t const *)&sig);
> + /* Compare all signatures in the primary bucket */
> + vmat = vceqq_u16(vsig,
> + vld1q_u16((uint16_t const *)prim_bkt-
> >sig_current));
> + x = vshlq_u16(vandq_u16(vmat, vdupq_n_u16(0x8000)),
> shift);
> + x64 = vpaddlq_u32(vpaddlq_u16(x));
> + *prim_hash_matches = (uint32_t)(vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 0)
> +
> + vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 1));
> + /* Compare all signatures in the secondary bucket */
> + vmat = vceqq_u16(vsig,
> + vld1q_u16((uint16_t const *)sec_bkt-
> >sig_current));
> + x = vshlq_u16(vandq_u16(vmat, vdupq_n_u16(0x8000)),
> shift);
> + x64 = vpaddlq_u32(vpaddlq_u16(x));
> + *sec_hash_matches = (uint32_t)(vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 0) +
> + vgetq_lane_u64(x64, 1));
> + break;
> #endif
> default:
> for (i = 0; i < RTE_HASH_BUCKET_ENTRIES; i++) {
> diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> index eacdaa8d4..0548c97f0 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.h
> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ struct rte_hash_key {
> enum rte_hash_sig_compare_function {
> RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SCALAR = 0,
> RTE_HASH_COMPARE_SSE,
> + RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NEON,
> RTE_HASH_COMPARE_NUM
> };
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-11 7:30 [dpdk-dev] " Ruifeng Wang
2019-02-11 7:49 ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran [this message]
2019-02-11 9:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8c27de0eb69bc17562e64f977044f59cb7169770.camel@marvell.com \
--to=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).