From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD20A0C41; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:52:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600B34003F; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:52:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6A44003E for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:52:49 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: 3xJ0wqz9bH4qZxRy9Owuko0K573NDFqc9QOxrY82nfR2VHIG9IIOZiYqLDZfbuoogdvfOpRvMe LURNbsxkRjkw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9982"; a="261003681" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,293,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="261003681" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 May 2021 09:52:47 -0700 IronPort-SDR: o4gMHB+nUjAgvLllSAyVCkDwwZkdciOzJCX0cxzNNt6KjL6hHhP+dsgxDn0kldRGZ20seshGgB sT/jqd4wKY+w== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,293,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="610008969" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.210.216]) ([10.213.210.216]) by orsmga005-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 May 2021 09:52:45 -0700 To: "Min Hu (Connor)" , dev@dpdk.org Cc: bernard.iremonger@intel.com, thomas@monjalon.net References: <1616830818-3127-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> <1619657448-57567-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> From: Ferruh Yigit X-User: ferruhy Message-ID: <8c549935-875f-ff70-3e1f-5d56503059b7@intel.com> Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 17:52:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1619657448-57567-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] fix check of port and core X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 4/29/2021 1:50 AM, Min Hu (Connor) wrote: > Currently, some examples check that the port is on the same NUMA > node as the polling thread for best performance. The method is > to compare the socket id of port and that of current core. If the > result is different, warning info will be given. > > But it ignores the port which is from numa node 0, that is, no > warning info will be given if the port is from numa node 0, and > this set of patches will fix it. > --- > v3: > * change "-w" to "-a". > > v2: > * add more commit info. > > Min Hu (Connor) (3): > examples/flow_classify: fix check of port and core > examples/l2fwd-cat: fix check of port and core > examples/skeleton: fix check of port and core > For series, Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit Only I am not sure if it is confusing to mention from 'flow_classify' in the commit log of 'l2fwd-cat' or 'skeleton' patches.