From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com (mail-wm0-f66.google.com [74.125.82.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14E61B3C4 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 13:44:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id r68so9253328wmr.3 for ; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 04:44:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dev-mellanox-co-il.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=Y2LhRW2E5nUPI/cpsxhxbzYlWykZX3tmPySfiwbHz7Y=; b=Eid3h6W/McSB8MtcwvNqeS31w0dR3kIPMulS/4N8NL37wINXfcT6Hqi9FwVuT/HFqB Jx1cIoW5b/QR9P6FPhF6y0+O02CcbqI18IIjchFW5PTKpes8AAO6dSEnNFSYQ7VWlHhE pYO0j9+8X1+56gxosgu/GwD/XQ+dGfZvpX1NbdReCWW1zgjqOiVlOKn9E3W/FGE3cGoI 8J3vE3Xl5YKeKtMbl2Y42A4p3kenVAejpuxrhj6TWr17uRtMgXkirVCK51VKdQaI0MJE /U4Jffp8PBSw6xM8KEvXOTStJnjflrvl8vWDYzn2JUWmorPllW9zfao2kgyyxgBRq9Gn pB9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=Y2LhRW2E5nUPI/cpsxhxbzYlWykZX3tmPySfiwbHz7Y=; b=YvMiM+70HSwn40UZ0kTeENSmCkgMvcmDC9y71T5WfF8gHtVigPIvAHOtDpvgXkYadW j9OyYk5btWHQuA8/qHJFhuEwiM5A/U38V7rzxiJra6/zCDHGj6xfLxN5FfkeY8ZRuVAr I8QBRjdpnM+MH0h7RWOd3isIl38m/YSVai8ft0oV9Cml6y1YxisCh/4DxOD1z3+wW7iN BgcN/L9ylUENsZvEXcRD5niiKpjIroEgST0Zajk9q1ct1VRsXpHW9SLmM+I+nhrdMFw1 DBzxuaWKCTjyC2+YcnG8ds2vFHa9Jc6WKM4pCOcLD5vdQi5rMbTQZfCUKqHFkC/DtPkb Jw3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXd669V0k3cQUlQQlzWNgpwHffSMw9Y017QBKcveEMgY452UfzE 9xYpbkAD41yRX+riebIseoaA4Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RtKZeUNWPwSPDso3KwcjXE4zM29f7hp9R75BXW2If9Peb6CKyEBLEkCGJVPE8Fq9VBISfN+w== X-Received: by 10.28.148.203 with SMTP id w194mr4930749wmd.91.1508759089129; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 04:44:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.38.219] ([193.47.165.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n14sm8998629wrg.38.2017.10.23.04.44.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Oct 2017 04:44:48 -0700 (PDT) To: Thomas Monjalon , Akhil Goyal Cc: pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com, radu.nicolau@intel.com, aviadye@mellanox.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, declan.doherty@intel.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, borisp@mellanox.com, sandeep.malik@nxp.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, shahafs@mellanox.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com References: <20171006181151.4758-1-akhil.goyal@nxp.com> <1c66817c-dfe5-4194-0406-57e2da7cdbe4@nxp.com> <26943210.ye3ieRSP5B@xps> From: Aviad Yehezkel Message-ID: <8dfd9518-009d-5387-a282-b0aa22be826d@dev.mellanox.co.il> Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:44:46 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <26943210.ye3ieRSP5B@xps> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/12] introduce security offload library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:44:49 -0000 On 10/22/2017 11:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 22/10/2017 22:37, Akhil Goyal: >> Hi All, >> On 10/21/2017 9:43 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote: >>> Hi Thomas, >>> On 10/20/2017 3:02 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>>> 16/10/2017 12:44, Thomas Monjalon: >>>>> 15/10/2017 00:17, Akhil Goyal: >>>>>> This patchset introduce the rte_security library in DPDK. >>>>>> This also includes the sample implementation of drivers and >>>>>> changes in ipsec gateway application to demonstrate its usage. >>>>> [...] >>>>>> This patchset is also available at: >>>>>> git://dpdk.org/draft/dpdk-draft-ipsec >>>>>> branch: integration_v4 >>>>> If I understand well, this patchset is the result of the group work? >>>>> Nothing else is needed to merge for the IPsec offload features? >>> Yes this patchset is a result of a group work. >>> We do not need anything else to be merged for ipsec offload features. >>> But Aviad has made some fixes in the ipsec application which may result >>> in conflict with the last patch in this series. >>> So v4 was just rebased over those patches sent by Aviad separately. >>> We would send a v5 incorporating/answering to all the comments/queries >>> rebased over the v2 of the Aviad's fixes to the application. >>> >> Just for information, >> I have rebased the rte_security patches over crypto-next and over >> Aviad's v2. The patches are available at the draft tree >> "git://dpdk.org/draft/dpdk-draft-ipsec", branch integration_v5. >> >> The patchset include the changes suggested by Thomas and Konstantin on v4. >> >> The patches are not sent to the mailing list as the ipsec-secgw patches >> from Aviad needs a v3 and I would like to send the patch set rebased >> over the v3. I will send the patchset as soon as Aviad's patches are >> ready to be merged(most probably on Monday). >> >> Please let me know in case, there is some risk in getting this series >> applied in RC2. > Thanks for the info Akhil. > A lot of other things are not yet ready for RC2. > You are still in time. > I am working on v3 in these moments.