From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: matan@mellanox.com, chenbo.xia@intel.com, tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: return ready when at least 1 vring is configured
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:53:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e0e8343-4e85-71f3-8c85-07eb1cff6079@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1598944057-32690-1-git-send-email-changpeng.liu@intel.com>
Hi Changpeng,
On 9/1/20 9:07 AM, Changpeng Liu wrote:
> Commit d0fcc38f "vhost: improve device readiness notifications"
> needs at least 2 vrings before changing the device state to
> ready, this is fine for NET device but not correct for BLK
> device.
>
> The number of vring required should be based on the device
> type, e.g. virtio_scsi device needs at least 3 vrings, and
> virtio_net needs at least 2 vrings, virtio_blk needs at least
> 1 vring. So instead of doing it in vhost library it's better
> that the application who uses this library do this check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Changpeng Liu <changpeng.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> index c3c924f..4d1883c 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
> @@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@
> vq->enabled;
> }
>
> -#define VIRTIO_DEV_NUM_VQS_TO_BE_READY 2u
> +#define VIRTIO_DEV_NUM_VQS_TO_BE_READY 1u
I think it would be better to rely on VIRTIO_DEV_BUILTIN_VIRTIO_NET to
know whether it should wait for 1 or 2 queues to determine if ready.
> static int
> virtio_is_ready(struct virtio_net *dev)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-18 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-01 7:07 Changpeng Liu
2020-09-18 9:53 ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2020-09-21 5:03 ` Liu, Changpeng
2020-09-21 10:19 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-09-22 7:22 ` Liu, Changpeng
2020-09-23 8:05 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-09-23 8:14 ` Liu, Changpeng
2020-09-29 13:54 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2020-09-29 14:05 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-09-29 18:15 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2020-09-30 2:48 ` Xia, Chenbo
2020-09-30 15:36 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-09-30 16:37 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2020-10-01 7:55 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-01 8:07 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
2020-10-01 8:26 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-01 8:42 ` Zhang, Roy Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e0e8343-4e85-71f3-8c85-07eb1cff6079@redhat.com \
--to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=changpeng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).