From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEAAA04B8; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:32:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F221D653; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:32:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8A61C1C0 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:32:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 045G3M4t056952; Tue, 5 May 2020 12:32:37 -0400 Received: from ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (1b.90.2fa9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.47.144.27]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30u8snf6xh-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 May 2020 12:32:37 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 045GW4Lr015874; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:32:35 GMT Received: from b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.15]) by ppma05wdc.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30s0g6j6tk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 05 May 2020 16:32:35 +0000 Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.237]) by b03cxnp07028.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 045GWZSt48628162 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 5 May 2020 16:32:35 GMT Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D4DC6057; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:32:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF19C605A; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:32:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Davids-MBP.randomparity.org (unknown [9.163.53.177]) by b03ledav006.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 5 May 2020 16:32:33 +0000 (GMT) To: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=c5=82_Krawczyk?= , mw@semihalf.com, "Tzalik, Guy" , Evgeny Schemeilin , igorch@amazon.com, Andrew Rybchenko References: <20200504174552.6700-1-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20200504210347.24094-1-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <18ecc473-3d80-a232-963f-19e34c021e72@intel.com> From: David Christensen Message-ID: <8f6efd02-741d-b606-3749-cae90da3be44@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 09:32:33 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <18ecc473-3d80-a232-963f-19e34c021e72@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-05_09:2020-05-04, 2020-05-05 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=758 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005050126 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: fix rte_memcpy build on ppc with gcc 9.3 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" >> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h b/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h >> index 25311ba1d..de47a5d2e 100644 >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/ppc/include/rte_memcpy.h >> @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ >> >> #include >> #include >> -/*To include altivec.h, GCC version must >= 4.8 */ >> -#include >> +#include "rte_altivec.h" >> +#include "rte_common.h" > > I can't find "rte_altivec.h", am I missing something. > > With just ignoring "-Warray-bounds" changes, I confirm ena build issue is fixed > with gcc 9.1 The rte_altivec.h is related to another open patch required to build on POWER systems (http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/69605/) that's waiting to be accepted. You may not have encountered it if you're not building the MLX5 PMD which has additional library requirements. Dave