From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186E01B0FA for ; Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:39:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Sep 2018 04:39:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,301,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="89154910" Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.39]) ([10.237.221.39]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Sep 2018 04:39:21 -0700 To: Ajit Khaparde , dev@dpdk.org References: <20180922045559.27438-1-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> <20180922045559.27438-5-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> From: Ferruh Yigit Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <8fae1890-3914-bc24-6d18-0fabd7b13a6f@intel.com> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:39:20 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180922045559.27438-5-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/12] net/bnxt: update HWRM version X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:39:23 -0000 On 9/22/2018 5:55 AM, Ajit Khaparde wrote: > Update the HWRM API to version 1.9.2.53 > Signed-off-by: Ajit Khaparde > -- > v1->v2: > Update from 1.9.2.45 to version 1.9.2.53 > --- > drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_stats.c | 12 +- > drivers/net/bnxt/hsi_struct_def_dpdk.h | 24017 +++++++++++------------ > 2 files changed, 11540 insertions(+), 12489 deletions(-) Hi Ajit, I am aware that this is HWRM API version update but this is a big patch. Are all these updates used for DPDK? Can it be possible to drop some part or can it be possible to split this into multiple logical updates? Thanks, ferruh