From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EB2A0A02; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:03:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD0C4067B; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:03:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B649240147 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2021 13:03:30 +0100 (CET) IronPort-SDR: UUONOhzqyyqK8QOi0U5qTmPja5cbcEfeGTVVnhdeR0QCpIlEJBv3O7XAX2T8/mC7Mh5oOkX5mR 6aFGGDUP3TYQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9933"; a="190941013" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,277,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="190941013" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2021 05:03:29 -0700 IronPort-SDR: fP5sgMhrFJeUf3gUQYZVdKXwOozws/cpUURSGb8FaZhDFZPuBmexN8ffF9ZBEagwiVbdHVfxC/ B+ud/C51bObw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,277,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="415977000" Received: from vmedvedk-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.213.248.210]) ([10.213.248.210]) by orsmga008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Mar 2021 05:03:27 -0700 To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com References: <118983719.HxGbWRN4Bm@thomas> From: "Medvedkin, Vladimir" Message-ID: <8fca1416-37f7-3046-ab3a-c4c60a6c4a6e@intel.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 15:03:24 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <118983719.HxGbWRN4Bm@thomas> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] add new kv hash table X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Thomas, On 25/03/2021 00:28, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 08/05/2020 21:58, Vladimir Medvedkin: >> Currently DPDK has a special implementation of a hash table for >> 4 byte keys which is called FBK hash. Unfortunately its main drawback >> is that it only supports 2 byte values. >> The new implementation called KV hash >> supports 4 byte keys and 8 byte associated values, >> which is enough to store a pointer. > > Waiting for a v5. > Is it abandoned? It is suspended till further rework. > > -- Regards, Vladimir