From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Guinan Sun <guinanx.sun@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
Qiming Yang <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
Przemyslaw Patynowski <przemyslawx.patynowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/9] net/i40e/base: add VLAN field for input set
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 12:09:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ffb27f2-46fd-3c9a-5464-9c02a8705bc8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200905024938.14609-2-guinanx.sun@intel.com>
On 9/5/2020 3:49 AM, Guinan Sun wrote:
> Add VLAN bit used during flow director programming, as a part of
> input set for HW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Przemyslaw Patynowski <przemyslawx.patynowski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guinan Sun <guinanx.sun@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_type.h | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_type.h b/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_type.h
> index cf4134583..c8e7164e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_type.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/base/i40e_type.h
> @@ -1926,6 +1926,8 @@ struct i40e_lldp_variables {
> #define I40E_L4_DST_MASK (0x1ULL << I40E_L4_DST_SHIFT)
> #define I40E_VERIFY_TAG_SHIFT 31
> #define I40E_VERIFY_TAG_MASK (0x3ULL << I40E_VERIFY_TAG_SHIFT)
> +#define I40E_VLAN_SRC_SHIFT 55
> +#define I40E_VLAN_SRC_MASK (0x1ULL << I40E_VLAN_SRC_SHIFT)
>
> #define I40E_FLEX_50_SHIFT 13
> #define I40E_FLEX_50_MASK (0x1ULL << I40E_FLEX_50_SHIFT)
>
Hi Guinan, Qi,
These new defines in the base code seems not used by driver, is there a benefit
to add them now?
What do you think to add them when they are used by the driver code?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-07 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-05 2:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/9] update i40e base code Guinan Sun
2020-09-05 2:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/9] net/i40e/base: add VLAN field for input set Guinan Sun
2020-09-07 11:09 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-09-05 2:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/9] net/i40e/base: update FW API version Guinan Sun
2020-09-07 11:10 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-05 2:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/9] net/i40e/base: enable pipe monitor thresholds Guinan Sun
2020-09-07 11:11 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-09-05 2:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] net/i40e/base: fix missing function header arguments Guinan Sun
2020-09-08 8:03 ` Yang, Qiming
2020-09-05 2:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/9] net/i40e/base: add support for minimum rollback revision Guinan Sun
2020-09-05 2:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/9] net/i40e/base: fix Rx only for unicast promisc on VLAN Guinan Sun
2020-09-05 2:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/9] net/i40e/base: add EEE LPI status check for X722 adapters Guinan Sun
2020-09-05 2:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/9] net/i40e/base: fix PHY config param when enabling EEE Guinan Sun
2020-09-05 2:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 9/9] net/i40e/base: update version Guinan Sun
2020-09-07 6:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/9] update i40e base code Zhang, Qi Z
2020-09-12 3:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] " Guinan Sun
2020-09-12 3:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/7] net/i40e/base: update FW API version Guinan Sun
2020-09-12 3:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/7] net/i40e/base: fix missing function header arguments Guinan Sun
2020-09-12 3:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/7] net/i40e/base: add support for minimum rollback revision Guinan Sun
2020-09-12 3:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/7] net/i40e/base: fix Rx only for unicast promisc on VLAN Guinan Sun
2020-09-12 3:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/7] net/i40e/base: add EEE LPI status check for X722 adapters Guinan Sun
2020-09-12 3:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/7] net/i40e/base: fix PHY config param when enabling EEE Guinan Sun
2020-09-12 3:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/7] net/i40e/base: update version Guinan Sun
2020-09-13 1:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] update i40e base code Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ffb27f2-46fd-3c9a-5464-9c02a8705bc8@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=guinanx.sun@intel.com \
--cc=przemyslawx.patynowski@intel.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).