From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77FBA04B7; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:37:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A507C1DDF4; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:37:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wnew3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wnew3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.17]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B321DDF0 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:37:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6302EEAE; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:37:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:37:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= z/365Y4pDXj44RcWsgMMPv3VrVs5C+bVwSn9xULzVhE=; b=TlZ5Tzx6nvksrEqN bEcwjOEaLzDatFFKlYsoEixZyYI2ezLxT83NwxsrFP5PxyCZIuRSeuhAazknpkD8 u67st6Z9wvr115mgS1SQL5U9pieXxiN/FG/M4aUKVOJI2WzJ7FvjZbkqCpTWIo7k NevPzpxQdI46sFOZIEVOxgOHBvAzMY/hIHgEYz5LODiRx3VqJGPpn8/UUcqCPsDH OHm6tntNBRUIqDpV81guJy1rPszp6NOrmy8lrBfaO6TyrGAdSEn92/IyX/q/PPZS Z17RjTo6kliQfkZ1rDYvLcIYeZneLmTnBdwz6QJLjsM7CVc1REDDWqjwixJBJtJ5 deEm9A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=z/365Y4pDXj44RcWsgMMPv3VrVs5C+bVwSn9xULzV hE=; b=jw3hJlur6qnWcwrm5bB7vbcUbQ0KM6KDiyC0u6QBylISGbIxEQM2GdHzW qOw6qMM2HSXJJyTIDerfJOMy0qbVPQaIL+VEAPF9WOpApJigN7k0OeQgYzon3BGg wEc7OhS9G1151tk6N9nYIpeaY/PVZm4D8k6kgq69aFwSC833nF1JtIRjnoHz4WYJ +BC3uRFSzlZwcIPaESV6AGG0lFSEESzomP1oy7nuWTDymEobdw46FQGwkhTdZm8C bVJEwPVvN0hC2fAfzOx7aI5eDpdWN/wnBWmibn5bjPv/8w0tg2KfIzxSb8ySH7nI 1+0Q0d+gAo7Bzz80hudEnZ+cQ7YEQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedriedugdeftdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeffvdffjeeuteelfeeileduudeugfetjeelveefkeejfeeigeehteff vdekfeegudenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrdhorhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvd dtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhr ohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CA8693280064; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 06:37:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Dekel Peled Cc: orika@nvidia.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, beilei.xing@intel.com, bernard.iremonger@intel.com, matan@nvidia.com, shahafs@nvidia.com, viacheslavo@nvidia.com, dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 12:37:30 +0200 Message-ID: <9004960.nr50qyYYLH@thomas> In-Reply-To: <5748ec9307e9c126d5ab1514f375ba12a8960f66.1602595426.git.dekelp@nvidia.com> References: <5748ec9307e9c126d5ab1514f375ba12a8960f66.1602595426.git.dekelp@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/5] ethdev: add IPv6 fragment extension header item X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 13/10/2020 15:32, Dekel Peled: > Applications handling fragmented IPv6 packets need to match on IPv6 > fragment extension header, in order to identify the fragments order > and location in the packet. > This patch introduces the IPv6 fragment extension header item, > proposed in [1]. > > Relevant definitions are moved from lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ip_frag.h > to lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h, as they are needed for IPv6 header handling. > struct ipv6_extension_fragment renamed to rte_ipv6_fragment_ext to > adapt it to the common naming convention. > > Default mask is not defined, since all fields are optional. > > [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-March/160255.html > > Signed-off-by: Dekel Peled > Acked-by: Ori Kam Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon